GAC History not synced on swgoh.gg
Why is the last quarter not synced yet?
Forum Discussion
"TVF;c-2250981" wrote:
"Antario;c-2250977" wrote:
"TVF;c-2250971" wrote:
"Antario;c-2250970" wrote:
"TVF;c-2250901" wrote:
It's not like it matters right now...
Well, I had some interesting matches last quarter and would like to check what my opponent used against my defense. So yes, it matters for me.
"right now...."
GAC starts again in few days. I want to make roster investment decisions based on the data... right now.
You want to make roster decisions for 5v5 based on a 3v3 result?
We still have ships?"Antario;c-2250991" wrote:
"TVF;c-2250981" wrote:
"Antario;c-2250977" wrote:
"TVF;c-2250971" wrote:
"Antario;c-2250970" wrote:
"TVF;c-2250901" wrote:
It's not like it matters right now...
Well, I had some interesting matches last quarter and would like to check what my opponent used against my defense. So yes, it matters for me.
"right now...."
GAC starts again in few days. I want to make roster investment decisions based on the data... right now.
You want to make roster decisions for 5v5 based on a 3v3 result?
We still have ships?
I guess.
There's also still over a full day before you have to lock in your roster.- Also, I could be wrong, but I feel like they usually take longer in the off weeks, and probably because they can.
"TVF;c-2250996" wrote:
Also, I could be wrong, but I feel like they usually take longer in the off weeks, and probably because they can.
Maybe. I thought there is no human intervention needed for the data sync. Looks like I was wrong.- Should be all set now.
- I was right?
*gasp* "TVF;c-2251063" wrote:
I was right?
*gasp*
not quite, they were having an issue, and having an issue locating the source. They were able to resolve it and everything is updating as it should now."Kyno;c-2251093" wrote:
"TVF;c-2251063" wrote:
I was right?
*gasp*
not quite, they were having an issue, and having an issue locating the source. They were able to resolve it and everything is updating as it should now.
It was ready in plenty of time, so close enough!
https://media0.giphy.com/media/52FcaTVc9Y1rk7q1NQ/giphy.gif"TVF;c-2251134" wrote:
"Kyno;c-2251093" wrote:
"TVF;c-2251063" wrote:
I was right?
*gasp*
not quite, they were having an issue, and having an issue locating the source. They were able to resolve it and everything is updating as it should now.
It was ready in plenty of time, so close enough!
https://media0.giphy.com/media/52FcaTVc9Y1rk7q1NQ/giphy.gif
I could have used an extra day or 2."Kyno;c-2251135" wrote:
"TVF;c-2251134" wrote:
"Kyno;c-2251093" wrote:
"TVF;c-2251063" wrote:
I was right?
*gasp*
not quite, they were having an issue, and having an issue locating the source. They were able to resolve it and everything is updating as it should now.
It was ready in plenty of time, so close enough!
https://media0.giphy.com/media/52FcaTVc9Y1rk7q1NQ/giphy.gif
I could have used an extra day or 2.
You still have over 24 hours!
