GAC Problems Solved (collision/points)
1. People collude in GA to get 64 points setting weak defenses 2. People set only 1 defense limiting another progress 3. Only 4 ga, doesn't give winners a advantage it just rewards lucky matching (o...
Forum Discussion
So, just quickly for your three easy and effective solutions:
1. I face a lot of people in GA who have better roster's than I do, and an important part of having a chance at winning is being able to personalise what you use where in order to take them on. It is a gamemode based in strategy, and to be honest, I'm not sure I have encountered very many matches in all of GA where it was impossible for me to win. I have lost lots, but that's different. The defense setting stage each time is necessary.
2. They already do this for people who set no defenses and it really annoys the opposition, because whilst there isn't necessarily much synergy, you are immediately faced against the strongest part of someone's roster. I may be misinterpreting you here, but if someone does that against someone they haven't "colluded" with, surely that person then suffers from an inevitable loss of banners?
3. I agree with Kyno here, and also: we are just starting our first non-exhibition GAC, they have let a lot to be desired in many respects, but you can't know how accurate or inaccurate the rankings will serve to be until the end of the first one at least, they run exhibitions and tweak things for a reason.
All in all, not trying to be rude or anything, so sorry if it comes along as aggressive, but the different parts of the game are usually there for a reason, just taking away things you don't use or like isn't necessarily going to make things smoother on the whole. There's room for improvement, but it needs something more subtle than just broad stroke solutions, as they invariably open up new problems, like some I suggested. Good to come up with them though, see how people respond.
1. I face a lot of people in GA who have better roster's than I do, and an important part of having a chance at winning is being able to personalise what you use where in order to take them on. It is a gamemode based in strategy, and to be honest, I'm not sure I have encountered very many matches in all of GA where it was impossible for me to win. I have lost lots, but that's different. The defense setting stage each time is necessary.
2. They already do this for people who set no defenses and it really annoys the opposition, because whilst there isn't necessarily much synergy, you are immediately faced against the strongest part of someone's roster. I may be misinterpreting you here, but if someone does that against someone they haven't "colluded" with, surely that person then suffers from an inevitable loss of banners?
3. I agree with Kyno here, and also: we are just starting our first non-exhibition GAC, they have let a lot to be desired in many respects, but you can't know how accurate or inaccurate the rankings will serve to be until the end of the first one at least, they run exhibitions and tweak things for a reason.
All in all, not trying to be rude or anything, so sorry if it comes along as aggressive, but the different parts of the game are usually there for a reason, just taking away things you don't use or like isn't necessarily going to make things smoother on the whole. There's room for improvement, but it needs something more subtle than just broad stroke solutions, as they invariably open up new problems, like some I suggested. Good to come up with them though, see how people respond.
