GAC system maybe ?
Why not match people with the same GP for an example if you are between 2 to 3 mill GP u get matched with that GP instead of unfair playing field with the current system Just a thought
Forum Discussion
"Starslayer;c-2394305" wrote:"Screerider;c-2394290" wrote:"DarjeloSalas;c-2394289" wrote:Oh, so if they do care and win, then they wouldn't be dropping for losing and not caring. Scenario is made up."Screerider;c-2394283" wrote:
Attack once, get 10. Win 10-0."StarSon;c-2394276" wrote:"Screerider;c-2394271" wrote:
Attack once, get 10. Win 10-0.
Attack once, get 10. Lose 10-68.
How do they get the 68 if they don't care?
They attack once and win. If you’ve got 7M and your opponent has 2M, this is hardly impossible.
It seems to be a semantics dispute around 'caring', because depending on how you define "caring", you both have a point. Not caring could be 'I don't play and I drop, who cares" or could be "I don't care so I play once in a while with minimul effort, slowly dropping until I hover in far too little ponds for my size".
The problem is, if such players do care enough to win, they couldn't also be dropping by losing. It's made-up.
