Ghost in Platoons? Seriously?
The ghost was added to the platoons on the 4th line of planets specifically so that the guild could not complete 50/50 CM?
@CG_SBCrumb , @CG_Tusken_Meathead
@CG_SBCrumb , @CG_Tusken_Meathead
Forum Discussion
24 Replies
- It says vertical slice. So preload that planet and fill ghost the day before you open the mix planet. It’s not actual rocket science.
"Damodamo;c-2455517" wrote:
It says vertical slice. So preload that planet and fill ghost the day before you open the mix planet. It’s not actual rocket science.
Vertical slice was when tb phase went right to left or left to right (all but RotE)"Damodamo;c-2455517" wrote:
It says vertical slice. So preload that planet and fill ghost the day before you open the mix planet. It’s not actual rocket science.
Anyway, in this case, the player who places the ghost in the platoons will be added to the exclusion list, since he did not take part in the CM- Someone provided you a direct quote proving this was not CG's intent. Maybe their intentions have changed, but they haven't told us. So, it's very reasonable to assume this is an oversight and call it to CG's attention.
"Bradford;c-2455632" wrote:
Obviously nobody cares, you see there is no reaction. This was a quote from 2017 about vertical slice. There is not a single word in the version of 2022 from CG_SBCrrumb. Only that you have to fill the operations with careful forethought and planning.
At least one person cares. I admit that I don't care because combat points are such a small piece of total TP in this TB.
It doesn't matter when the quote came from, imo. Until they say something that contradicts it, or until they have a consistent action history to indicate otherwise, it should be assumed to be their intent. And we shouldn't be surprised by people wanting clarification.
You are free to feel otherwise, of course, and say that statements have a shelf life and their most recent action is enough evidence to you that CG has changed their intended practice. But you can't expect that to satisfy everyone.- There's also nothing saying that all of their established standards are being thrown out the window.
"Bradford;c-2455636" wrote:
https://forums.galaxy-of-heroes.starwars.ea.com/discussion/260407/new-territory-battle-rise-of-the-empire-details#latest
This one is the last and current one. There is not a single word that they have the intention that a toon/ ship can not be required for both.
And what I mean is that everytime someone opens a thread to show a bug, a mistake or something else IMPORTANT what has to be checked there is a reaction within a few hours or sometimes the next day. But here it is not the case.
What a weird take. Sure, CG could have changed their mind, but they never said so, and based on them trying to get things back in line (like when they swapped out that Inquisitor from a planet they were required on) we can safely assume their intent is still not to have required characters in platoons.
Also, CG never reacts "within a few hours," and very rarely "the next day." Just because they don't acknowledge someone's concern doesn't mean they won't act on it later. The only thing you're right about is the fact that CG doesn't care if their game is wrong or not."Ragnarok_COTF;c-2455634" wrote:
You are free to feel otherwise, of course, and say that statements have a shelf life and their most recent action is enough evidence to you that CG has changed their intended practice. But you can't expect that to satisfy everyone.- The issue here is that you are the only one making a definitive claim about whether this is intentional or not. Everyone else is asking for clarification. You are saying we already have it. So you could be wrong or right. No one else can be.
"Bradford;c-2455644" wrote:
If you would be so right as you all think there would be alreay a thread in the dev announcement that they investigate your wolrd changing problem. get over it. it is such a small thing and you all try to make a big thing out it.
and there is no mind changing, in 2017 there was no rote.
I don't even know why you keep railing on this. Weird hill to die on. Here is the most recent post, from last month, where they changed operations to remove these required characters. They missed some though, and seemed completely unaware that there were other issues when presented with that fact.
https://forums.galaxy-of-heroes.starwars.ea.com/discussion/267408/update-12-6
