Give us the option for GAC.
Give us the option to choose between 3 vs 3 and 5 vs 5 at each GAC sign up. Let those of us that want to do 5 vs 5 play 5’s and those that want to do 3 vs 3 play 3’s.
Forum Discussion
"Ragnarok_COTF;c-2457332" wrote:"PeachyPeachSWGOH;c-2457306" wrote:
It is known that lots of folks simply sign up and skip battles in 3v3 because they don't like it. They end up doing just fine in the game otherwise. It is a perfectly fine solution.
Not sure how good "just fine" is. But, in OP's opinion, it could be better. So, rather than explaining why the status quo is "just fine", can you tell me why it's better than OP's proposition? If not, your response is not relevant to the discussion.
Why do I need to show that the status quo is better? OP wants the change, and OP is the one that is supposed to show that the change will be for the better. Otherwise why pay the cost to change?
And how is it that stating that the status quo is just fine is irrelevant to the discussion? In any discussion about whether some changes need to happen to something, an assessment on the status quo is very relevant to the discussion.
Speaking of relevance to the discussion, up to this point in this reply of yours, you have made numerous posts in the thread, all of which seem to be in some sort of self appointed sheriff-in-town capacity. How is that addressing the OP's issue or relevant to the discussion?
"Ragnarok_COTF;c-2457332" wrote:"PeachyPeachSWGOH;c-2457306" wrote:
Maybe most of us prefer 5v5 better because kits/teams are designed for 5v5, but that is the point of 3v3 - to get us out of the comfortable zone. There are many other things CG put in the game that are not meant to be liked but to challenge us outside of our comfortable zone. 3v3 is actually one of the things that come with lesser costs if skipped. Just a temporary income drop which you'll be able to mostly earn back later.
I agree that paying 3v3 little to no mind, which I have done for a while, is essentially revenue neutral. But, GAC is more to me than a source of income in game, so telling me I get the same rewards is not sufficient. Because with OP's suggestion, I would get the same income AND have more fun.
That's all fine. I'll just note that "more fun" is not the same as "better".
