Give us the option for GAC.
Give us the option to choose between 3 vs 3 and 5 vs 5 at each GAC sign up. Let those of us that want to do 5 vs 5 play 5’s and those that want to do 3 vs 3 play 3’s.
Forum Discussion
"PeachyPeachSWGOH;c-2457354" wrote:
Why do I need to show that the status quo is better? OP wants the change, and OP is the one that is supposed to show that the change will be for the better. Otherwise why pay the cost to change?
Good point. If a change is neutral, I agree that it shouldn't change. I suppose I should reword my request. If you think OP's suggestion is worse or no better than the status quo, can you explain why?
"PeachyPeachSWGOH;c-2457354" wrote:
And how is it that stating that the status quo is just fine is irrelevant to the discussion? In any discussion about whether some changes need to happen to something, an assessment on the status quo is very relevant to the discussion.
What matters to this discussion is the status quo relative to the change, not in a vacuum. I agree that the status quo is "fine". I would quit or at least take a break if it weren't.
"PeachyPeachSWGOH;c-2457354" wrote:
Speaking of relevance to the discussion, up to this point in this reply of yours, you have made numerous posts in the thread, all of which seem to be in some sort of self appointed sheriff-in-town capacity. How is that addressing the OP's issue or relevant to the discussion?
You're right. Me calling people out for going off topic is not relevant to the discussion. However, in some instances, such as yourself and nfidel, I did finally get some constructive feedback against my opinion that I think has merit. So I'm glad I prodded because my horizons were broadened and my stance has softened.
"PeachyPeachSWGOH;c-2457306" wrote:
I'll just note that "more fun" is not the same as "better".
Generally, yes, sure. However, in this case, all else being assumed equal (though I have been convinced that's a big assumption on my part), "fun" is my primary concern.
