GL value -not there
I've recently spoke with others who also feel the value of a GL is not proportional to what is costs. Every week I have a GL that loses to an ordinary, free lead like Grievous, or CLS. In some cases, ...
Forum Discussion
"Antario;c-2326103" wrote:
And finally, there are the newer characters like Mara and KK, who slotted in the right teams, can take out GLs even with low stars and gears. But that's the way the game progresses. New metas come and go. And rest assured this is not CG with bad business strategy but actually part of their strategy to generate incentive for people chasing those new marquees (and with even more willingness to spend money than for a GL maybe).
Well, awhile ago CG did state that they didn't intend (properly configured) GL teams to lose to non-GL teams, and proceeded to nerf a set of non-GLs on the ground of that rule. Moreover, the way they stated it sounded like it was going to be a standing policy rather than an one-off thing.
I don't have any problems with new meta non-GL toons themselves or the fact that they could be used to beat GLs. I just take a slight issue with CG quietly going back on a stated policy.
