@CG_Kozispoon Hi Devs,I'm not sure where to post this so I hope this finds you well. I have a concern and an idea that can help with it.I have recently discovered that Territory War matchmaking is based on the overall GP of all guild members who ENTER Territory Wars.My problem is that we are unable to see who is not contributing in attacks. We can only see who has laid defense and who has WON a battle. We currently believe that we are being hindered by players simply hitting the ENTER button but not contributing to attacks.In order for us to manage this, can I propose that we have a way of seeing 'BATTLES LOST'.This would help us manage players and also help in cleansing our guild so we can compete more fairly.Thanks for reading

"Astronavigatrix;c-1419150" wrote:We have similar issues -a few players enter without contributing anything or a few unreliable upper level players tap in with or two defense teams and disappear. We suspect they never bother attack. We've had great participation overall, but have been frustrated with the inconsistency of the numbers (29 sign up, 18 or so set defense, and the rest ?). With more detailed results we could plan better and have a conversation with those members that don't step up after they've committed. This aspect of the game is a fantastic way to get guild members to interact and would really benefit from more detailed results tracking. One thing that could also help with this is it we had an in game chat room that's similar to something like Discord or Line App. The problem players are usually the ones who don't communicate through external chat apps.@CG_Kozispoon Tell me that these are ideas you guys can take on board. Especially the TW management problem.

More reporting is needed in general, the problem with this is that even if a player attacks with a weak team and loses but reduces the enemy to 1 toon that gets cleaned up by cup(a good result honestly)...it still counts as a loss.What is needed is to see who attacked what with what and how they did. That way you can see if players are overkilling or getting good returns.

"ArchdemonJanuary;c-1418791" wrote:More reporting is needed in general, the problem with this is that even if a player attacks with a weak team and loses but reduces the enemy to 1 toon that gets cleaned up by cup(a good result honestly)...it still counts as a loss.What is needed is to see who attacked what with what and how they did. That way you can see if players are overkilling or getting good returns. To be honest, I'd be happy just to know who has tried to attack for now. At least I could then have a word with those claiming a free ride and cleanse the guild but I see your point for sure

Guild Management of Entered but Inactive TW Players

BosshTheUsurper
7 years ago
"Astronavigatrix;c-1419150" wrote:
We have similar issues -a few players enter without contributing anything or a few unreliable upper level players tap in with or two defense teams and disappear. We suspect they never bother attack. We've had great participation overall, but have been frustrated with the inconsistency of the numbers (29 sign up, 18 or so set defense, and the rest ?). With more detailed results we could plan better and have a conversation with those members that don't step up after they've committed. This aspect of the game is a fantastic way to get guild members to interact and would really benefit from more detailed results tracking.

One thing that could also help with this is it we had an in game chat room that's similar to something like Discord or Line App. The problem players are usually the ones who don't communicate through external chat apps.

@CG_Kozispoon Tell me that these are ideas you guys can take on board. Especially the TW management problem.
ScottyB2016
7 years ago
+1
ludmeister77
7 years ago
This is a great idea!
ArchdemonJanuar
7 years ago
More reporting is needed in general, the problem with this is that even if a player attacks with a weak team and loses but reduces the enemy to 1 toon that gets cleaned up by cup(a good result honestly)...it still counts as a loss.

What is needed is to see who attacked what with what and how they did. That way you can see if players are overkilling or getting good returns.
BosshTheUsurper
7 years ago
"ArchdemonJanuary;c-1418791" wrote:
More reporting is needed in general, the problem with this is that even if a player attacks with a weak team and loses but reduces the enemy to 1 toon that gets cleaned up by cup(a good result honestly)...it still counts as a loss.

What is needed is to see who attacked what with what and how they did. That way you can see if players are overkilling or getting good returns.

To be honest, I'd be happy just to know who has tried to attack for now. At least I could then have a word with those claiming a free ride and cleanse the guild but I see your point for sure
Astronavigatrix
7 years ago
We have similar issues -a few players enter without contributing anything or a few unreliable upper level players tap in with or two defense teams and disappear. We suspect they never bother attack. We've had great participation overall, but have been frustrated with the inconsistency of the numbers (29 sign up, 18 or so set defense, and the rest ?). With more detailed results we could plan better and have a conversation with those members that don't step up after they've committed. This aspect of the game is a fantastic way to get guild members to interact and would really benefit from more detailed results tracking.
CG_Kozispoon
7 years ago

The Active GP bracket only determines the rewards for the guild. This does not factor into matchmaking.
LiathSW
7 years ago
"CG_Kozispoon;c-1419954" wrote:

The Active GP bracket only determines the rewards for the guild. This does not factor into matchmaking.

That's good information, but it doesn't really relate to this thread.... this is asking for more management tools to be able to tell who is actually active.
BosshTheUsurper
7 years ago
"CG_Kozispoon;c-1419954" wrote:

The Active GP bracket only determines the rewards for the guild. This does not factor into matchmaking.

If this is true then why have we once been paired with a guild who had 50% higher GP than us? Also, are you able to reply regarding the original post please

Thank you
LiathSW
7 years ago
"BosshTheUsurper;c-1421345" wrote:
"CG_Kozispoon;c-1419954" wrote:

The Active GP bracket only determines the rewards for the guild. This does not factor into matchmaking.

If this is true then why have we once been paired with a guild who had 50% higher GP than us?
Thank you

She said the bracket does NOT factor into matchmaking, so I don't understand your question.