Galactic Legend Rey v Galactic Legend KyloRey: Greater Investment Kylo: Lesser Investment(Rey requires more characters than Kylo that have incredibly limited use making them useless post event)Result: Kylo > ReyKylo is one of the best PvE / PvP characters while outperforming Rey in arena without requiring massive investment to counter (GS / Han / Chewie)Now we have Jedi Master Luke & Sith Eternal EmperorJML: Much greater investmentSEE: Much friendlier investmentY’all already know it’ll be SEE > JML

Is JML really that much more of an investment? Several of JML’s requirements are carried over from JKL and many of them are characters that are very common in the game to have already with relics while SEEP’s requirements have more characters people are unluckily to have previously reliced

Idk I’m already almost done with the JML reqs and nowhere close to GLEE or SLK. So GLEE might be significantly better than JML, but the investment required isn’t necessarily greater for JML.

I am waaaay closer to jml then I am See so it is an easy choice for me.

I already have SLKR (for arena / raids) so I'm not too worried on how JML's performance is compared to SEE, as a Galactic Legend, he should still be a powerful threat in GAC and TW, and some of his prereqs are good for my roster as a whole

"SemiGod;d-236069" wrote:Galactic Legend Rey v Galactic Legend KyloRey: Greater Investment Kylo: Lesser Investment(Rey requires more characters than Kylo that have incredibly limited use making them useless post event)Result: Kylo > ReyKylo is one of the best PvE / PvP characters while outperforming Rey in arena without requiring massive investment to counter (GS / Han / Chewie)Now we have Jedi Master Luke & Sith Eternal EmperorJML: Much greater investmentSEE: Much friendlier investmentY’all already know it’ll be SEE > JMLYou think that Krennic and Royal Guard are more useful than HYoda and Biggs? That's...different.

Is History Going Repeat Itself? | EA Forums

snoopy4pres
5 years ago
Is JML really that much more of an investment? Several of JML’s requirements are carried over from JKL and many of them are characters that are very common in the game to have already with relics while SEEP’s requirements have more characters people are unluckily to have previously reliced
Persimius
Seasoned Traveler
5 years ago
Idk I’m already almost done with the JML reqs and nowhere close to GLEE or SLK. So GLEE might be significantly better than JML, but the investment required isn’t necessarily greater for JML.
yankeeh8er
5 years ago
I am waaaay closer to jml then I am See so it is an easy choice for me.
NotRealUltra
Seasoned Newcomer
5 years ago
I already have SLKR (for arena / raids) so I'm not too worried on how JML's performance is compared to SEE, as a Galactic Legend, he should still be a powerful threat in GAC and TW, and some of his prereqs are good for my roster as a whole
InyakSolomon88
5 years ago
"SemiGod;d-236069" wrote:
Galactic Legend Rey v Galactic Legend Kylo

Rey: Greater Investment
Kylo: Lesser Investment

(Rey requires more characters than Kylo that have incredibly limited use making them useless post event)

Result: Kylo > Rey

Kylo is one of the best PvE / PvP characters while outperforming Rey in arena without requiring massive investment to counter (GS / Han / Chewie)

Now we have Jedi Master Luke & Sith Eternal Emperor

JML: Much greater investment
SEE: Much friendlier investment

Y’all already know it’ll be SEE > JML

You think that Krennic and Royal Guard are more useful than HYoda and Biggs? That's...different.
gchaplain1
5 years ago
I'm closer to SEE but it's pretty even across the board. New players can get SEE and Vets should be close to JML. CG honestly tossed the players a favor this time. Not mention all of JML requirements are essential toons outside of Leia.
Pengin83
5 years ago
You forgot to mention that LS has much better options to work with. DS doesn’t have any equivalents to JKL and GAS.
gchaplain1
5 years ago
I was honestly hoping GAS or Malak(to help the majority of people boltster their ds roster) would be a requirement for SEE but I love using my imperial troopers and empire squads so I can't complain. But yes the final result of the grind heavily favors JML. Especially for gac.
TargetEadu
5 years ago
"Scuttlebutt;c-2170611" wrote:
You forgot to mention that LS has much better options to work with. DS doesn’t have any equivalents to JKL and GAS.

There’s also the fact that, assuming JML gets only the Jedi tag and SEE only the Sith tag, Jedi have much stronger synergy outside of their leads. While Sith may boast to have more strong characters, none of them really synergize with other Sith besides Traya’s cleanse and the Triumvirate as a whole.
NotRealUltra
Seasoned Newcomer
5 years ago
"InyakSolomon88;c-2170608" wrote:
"SemiGod;d-236069" wrote:
Galactic Legend Rey v Galactic Legend Kylo

Rey: Greater Investment
Kylo: Lesser Investment

(Rey requires more characters than Kylo that have incredibly limited use making them useless post event)

Result: Kylo > Rey

Kylo is one of the best PvE / PvP characters while outperforming Rey in arena without requiring massive investment to counter (GS / Han / Chewie)

Now we have Jedi Master Luke & Sith Eternal Emperor

JML: Much greater investment
SEE: Much friendlier investment

Y’all already know it’ll be SEE > JML

You think that Krennic and Royal Guard are more useful than HYoda and Biggs? That's...different.

FOST, FOO etc aren't that great but SLKR makes them super good under him

Who knows how well Krennic and Royal Guard will do under SEE?

I think Krennic is still a really good toon