Jedi Knight Anakin Drop Rate

"LordDirt;c-2078889" wrote:
Ok, you guys must be new because anytime someone says something about bad rates people blast them for not showing proof and say that the % hasn’t been changed.

Yeah, when you present no data and claim things are different than what the data says, you get asked to prove your findings with data. I seriously do not remember a single time someone had concrete data regarding drop rates that didn't fall somewhere close to the expected rate.

"DarjeloSalas;c-2078899" wrote:

"LordDirt;c-2078889" wrote:
Ok, you guys must be new because anytime someone says something about bad rates people blast them for not showing proof and say that the % hasn’t been changed.

You should do some forum searching.

The people that get blasted say things like “2 refreshes most days” or “around 5 months” or “like so many 0/5”. They don’t post data, they post chip-on-the-shoulder whining about something they haven’t been paying close attention to.

The OP has posted actual numbers. These are believable. Whether or not they are verifiable is up for debate, but they are vastly more credible than the vague stuff that the conspiracy theorists post.

And this sums it up for me. The devs have said the drop rates have never been altered. Every single credible data gathering exercise points to them never being altered. But still there are forum users who are happy to instantly dismiss all of that evidence but then instantly believe a guy that says they’ve “never had worse drop rates than Shaak Ti”. Some people just believe the things they’ve already made up their mind about.

Agree, but you also understand that it doesn’t matter if someone comes here with their irrelevant small sample size of data, regardless whether it falls within the mean or not, their data means nothing except to them and their farm.

I’ve got some small sample size data that falls outside the mean, but would mean nothing to you or anyone for that matter, but meant something to me trying to get a 33% drop for a certain event on the horizon.

"MaruMaru;c-2078926" wrote:
The truth is all data presented ever could have been altered. Each single one of those people may have been in some grand scheme to make you believe on a certain droprate. Maybe they are just a few people CG hired.

Conspiracy theories are fun!

Even if somebody took the time to fake a ton of data to “prove” drop rates change, that dataset would still be an outlier since there have been hundreds, if not thousands, of users that have shown the drop rates to average 33%. Outliers are to be questioned as they fall so far outside the norm.

If I had 1000 quarters and flipped them all 1000 times, you’d expect 500 tails and 500 heads on each one. But if 2 of those 1000 came up 900 heads and 100 tails, you’d definitely have a look at the quarters to see if they’re tampered with or just plain fake.

"KausDebonair;c-2078935" wrote:
Even if somebody took the time to fake a ton of data to “prove” drop rates change, that dataset would still be an outlier since there have been hundreds, if not thousands, of users that have shown the drop rates to average 33%. Outliers are to be questioned as they fall so far outside the norm.

If I had 1000 quarters and flipped them all 1000 times, you’d expect 500 tails and 500 heads on each one. But if 2 of those 1000 came up 900 heads and 100 tails, you’d definitely have a look at the quarters to see if they’re tampered with or just plain fake.

Funny you said quarters, I wouldnt use that as your example as you can flip them and get better odds of it being heads up.

Spin a penny and you can get them heads down most of the time.

"LordDirt;c-2078939" wrote:

"KausDebonair;c-2078935" wrote:
Even if somebody took the time to fake a ton of data to “prove” drop rates change, that dataset would still be an outlier since there have been hundreds, if not thousands, of users that have shown the drop rates to average 33%. Outliers are to be questioned as they fall so far outside the norm.

If I had 1000 quarters and flipped them all 1000 times, you’d expect 500 tails and 500 heads on each one. But if 2 of those 1000 came up 900 heads and 100 tails, you’d definitely have a look at the quarters to see if they’re tampered with or just plain fake.

Funny you said quarters, I wouldnt use that as your example as you can flip them and get better odds of it being heads up.

Spin a penny and you can get them heads down most of the time.

Which changes his point, how?

Or were you just sharing a little bit of trivia that everyone already knows?

"CCyrilS;c-2078940" wrote:

"LordDirt;c-2078939" wrote:

"KausDebonair;c-2078935" wrote:
Even if somebody took the time to fake a ton of data to “prove” drop rates change, that dataset would still be an outlier since there have been hundreds, if not thousands, of users that have shown the drop rates to average 33%. Outliers are to be questioned as they fall so far outside the norm.

If I had 1000 quarters and flipped them all 1000 times, you’d expect 500 tails and 500 heads on each one. But if 2 of those 1000 came up 900 heads and 100 tails, you’d definitely have a look at the quarters to see if they’re tampered with or just plain fake.

Funny you said quarters, I wouldnt use that as your example as you can flip them and get better odds of it being heads up.

Spin a penny and you can get them heads down most of the time.

Which changes his point, how?

Or were you just sharing a little bit of trivia that everyone already knows?

Nice ‘Nerd out’

"TheRHOMBUS;c-2079113" wrote:

"CCyrilS;c-2078940" wrote:

"LordDirt;c-2078939" wrote:

"KausDebonair;c-2078935" wrote:
Even if somebody took the time to fake a ton of data to “prove” drop rates change, that dataset would still be an outlier since there have been hundreds, if not thousands, of users that have shown the drop rates to average 33%. Outliers are to be questioned as they fall so far outside the norm.

If I had 1000 quarters and flipped them all 1000 times, you’d expect 500 tails and 500 heads on each one. But if 2 of those 1000 came up 900 heads and 100 tails, you’d definitely have a look at the quarters to see if they’re tampered with or just plain fake.

Funny you said quarters, I wouldnt use that as your example as you can flip them and get better odds of it being heads up.

Spin a penny and you can get them heads down most of the time.

Which changes his point, how?

Or were you just sharing a little bit of trivia that everyone already knows?

Nice ‘Nerd out’

https://media2.giphy.com/media/ADIua9uFz1EGI/100.webp?cid=790b7611aa4c36a2bc07eeff656beb2bf6a34402513ffb21&rid=100.gif