Kyber result
Looks like the top 10 players in Kyber division 1 have bunch of Relic 0 toons again. Does that mean if we have bunch of R7 toons we have no chances?
Forum Discussion
"littleMAC77;c-2144523" wrote:"Waqui;c-2144519" wrote:"littleMAC77;c-2144499" wrote:"Waqui;c-2144494" wrote:"Lysandrax;c-2144445" wrote:"Waqui;c-2144313" wrote:"Lysandrax;c-2144183" wrote:"Rath_Tarr;c-2144181" wrote:"Fhoenix;c-2144177" wrote:
:D two no shows and a half attempt... yep ... totally better at GAC @Rath_Tarr
Yep, better at GAC. All you have shown there is opponents' choices.
We don't control opponent selection or activity but we do control our roster, strategy and tactics and he has done so well enough to win all 12 matches with full clears and probably all feats, judging by his score.
If you're getting 1956 in GAC it is because of your opponent. They have set awful teams.
Check that GAC history again. You're not reading it right. They actually set normal defense for their GP range. I see both DR + Malak, JKR lead jedi, NS, Geos, Padme + GR, Shaak Ti + clones, GG + sep droids, Nute teams etc. They are not setting weak teams for their GP range. Yet Bus 74 still undersized most battles.
When you score 1950+ repearedly it's because you carefully theory crafted how to beat the defenses you're up against with undersized squads, built those squads and single characters just strong enough to do their job, modded them well to serve their purpose and saved them for offense. Bus 74 excels in this.
In bold undermines everything you have said and is what is actually being discussed.
Not only does it undermine what you've said here but in every single one of these threads where you try to say match-making is fine when it obviously needs some touch ups.
This Bus74 guy seems to know what hes doing, yes in the battles but foremostly in the match-making.
Now once more, if you're getting 1956 in GAC it is because your opponent has set an awful defence.
Check that GAC history again. You're not reading it right. They are not setting weak nor awful defenses for their GP range.
When you score 1950+ repearedly it's because you carefully theory crafted how to beat the defenses you're up against with undersized squads, built those squads and single characters just strong enough to do their job, modded them well to serve their purpose and saved them for offense. Bus 74 excels in this.
While I do not at all want to discredit what Bus 74 has done, and mostly agree with you that consistent high scores requires lots of crafting and practice in undersizing, it is equally wrong to dismiss the idea that the scores are inflated by weak defenses. Perfect evidence is the screenshot he shared; all sub g12 sep droids and phoenix are comically bad defenses for division 1. They would be comically bad for division 2 even.
Read my comment again. I'm not dismissing that he's up against weaker defenses than Lysandrax and I. I'm simply pointing out that his opponents don't set weak defenses relative to their GP range (or roster strength).
That screenshot is just one example. In another round he faced relic sep. droids, g12 geos, G12 OR (and weaker teams) and still he scored 1954. Yes, it's a weaker defense than Lysandrax and I face, but Bus 74 is also using his roster better than both of us.
But it is a weaker defense for his GP. He has more GP than me and I jump for joy when seeing full g11 or below defensive teams. They aren't that common in Division 2 even. If g12 OR is the 3rd best team on defense, that is barely a defense at the 4m+ gp range.
I don't consider relic sep. droids weak, and personally I still see lots of non-relic geonosians and g11-g12 OR teams when playing GAC (both my div. 1 accounts). One account only just recently promoted to div. 1 and saw lots of g11 defensive teams back in div. 2. I guess we just see different defenses.
