Kyber result
Looks like the top 10 players in Kyber division 1 have bunch of Relic 0 toons again.
Does that mean if we have bunch of R7 toons we have no chances?
Does that mean if we have bunch of R7 toons we have no chances?
Forum Discussion
91 Replies
"ZAP;c-2144219" wrote:
"Rath_Tarr;c-2144187" wrote:
"Lysandrax;c-2144183" wrote:
"Rath_Tarr;c-2144181" wrote:
"Fhoenix;c-2144177" wrote:
:D two no shows and a half attempt... yep ... totally better at GAC @Rath_Tarr
Yep, better at GAC. All you have shown there is opponents' choices.
We don't control opponent selection or activity but we do control our roster, strategy and tactics and he has done so well enough to win all 12 matches with full clears and probably all feats, judging by his score.
If you're getting 1956 in GAC it is because of your opponent. They have set awful teams.
You can see for yourself what he's doing..
https://swgoh.gg/p/887416736/gac-history/
Lots of weak D teams he faces, to allow for so many solos.
One interesting thing I noticed is Geos never touch his Traya, not ever, they only scratch sion.
Did you bother to.check his GAC stats?
He has finished Kyber in every GAC so far, as have I. My stats are good but his are better, across the board, most notably his 911 undersized squad battles. That's an average of 8.4 undersquad battles per match across 108 matches."Rath_Tarr;c-2144232" wrote:
"ZAP;c-2144219" wrote:
"Rath_Tarr;c-2144187" wrote:
"Lysandrax;c-2144183" wrote:
"Rath_Tarr;c-2144181" wrote:
"Fhoenix;c-2144177" wrote:
:D two no shows and a half attempt... yep ... totally better at GAC @Rath_Tarr
Yep, better at GAC. All you have shown there is opponents' choices.
We don't control opponent selection or activity but we do control our roster, strategy and tactics and he has done so well enough to win all 12 matches with full clears and probably all feats, judging by his score.
If you're getting 1956 in GAC it is because of your opponent. They have set awful teams.
You can see for yourself what he's doing..
https://swgoh.gg/p/887416736/gac-history/
Lots of weak D teams he faces, to allow for so many solos.
One interesting thing I noticed is Geos never touch his Traya, not ever, they only scratch sion.
Did you bother to.check his GAC stats?
He has finished Kyber in every GAC so far, as have I. My stats are good but his are better, across the board, most notably his 911 undersized squad battles. That's an average of 8.4 undersquad battles per match across 108 matches.
Might want to re-read that"CCyrilS;c-2144246" wrote:
"Rath_Tarr;c-2144232" wrote:
"ZAP;c-2144219" wrote:
"Rath_Tarr;c-2144187" wrote:
"Lysandrax;c-2144183" wrote:
"Rath_Tarr;c-2144181" wrote:
"Fhoenix;c-2144177" wrote:
:D two no shows and a half attempt... yep ... totally better at GAC @Rath_Tarr
Yep, better at GAC. All you have shown there is opponents' choices.
We don't control opponent selection or activity but we do control our roster, strategy and tactics and he has done so well enough to win all 12 matches with full clears and probably all feats, judging by his score.
If you're getting 1956 in GAC it is because of your opponent. They have set awful teams.
You can see for yourself what he's doing..
https://swgoh.gg/p/887416736/gac-history/
Lots of weak D teams he faces, to allow for so many solos.
One interesting thing I noticed is Geos never touch his Traya, not ever, they only scratch sion.
Did you bother to.check his GAC stats?
He has finished Kyber in every GAC so far, as have I. My stats are good but his are better, across the board, most notably his 911 undersized squad battles. That's an average of 8.4 undersquad battles per match across 108 matches.
Might want to re-read that
Mayyybe.:D
620 undersquads over 108 matches is still an impressive average of 5.7 undersquad wins per match."Rath_Tarr;c-2144249" wrote:
"CCyrilS;c-2144246" wrote:
"Rath_Tarr;c-2144232" wrote:
"ZAP;c-2144219" wrote:
"Rath_Tarr;c-2144187" wrote:
"Lysandrax;c-2144183" wrote:
"Rath_Tarr;c-2144181" wrote:
"Fhoenix;c-2144177" wrote:
:D two no shows and a half attempt... yep ... totally better at GAC @Rath_Tarr
Yep, better at GAC. All you have shown there is opponents' choices.
We don't control opponent selection or activity but we do control our roster, strategy and tactics and he has done so well enough to win all 12 matches with full clears and probably all feats, judging by his score.
If you're getting 1956 in GAC it is because of your opponent. They have set awful teams.
You can see for yourself what he's doing..
https://swgoh.gg/p/887416736/gac-history/
Lots of weak D teams he faces, to allow for so many solos.
One interesting thing I noticed is Geos never touch his Traya, not ever, they only scratch sion.
Did you bother to.check his GAC stats?
He has finished Kyber in every GAC so far, as have I. My stats are good but his are better, across the board, most notably his 911 undersized squad battles. That's an average of 8.4 undersquad battles per match across 108 matches.
Might want to re-read that
Mayyybe.:D
620 undersquads over 108 matches is still an impressive average of 5.7 undersquad wins per match.
Ok... math checks out ?- Get matched against people setting ewoks on defence
Get high score
Bestaroundkaratekid.mp4 "vincentlondon;d-233173" wrote:
Looks like the top 10 players in Kyber division 1 have bunch of Relic 0 toons again.
Does that mean if we have bunch of R7 toons we have no chances?
That just mean that matchmaking algorithm which allows someone to "win" without even chance to directly fight against absolute majority of competitors is... well, somewhat bad. :) Can't blame people for exploiting this though, I did it myself when GAC was my main focus in the game."Lysandrax;c-2144279" wrote:
Get matched against people setting ewoks on defence
Get high score
Bestaroundkaratekid.mp4
Well, he/she does put Ewoks on D too, but still got higher score than his/her opponents. When you have less than 5M GP and keep your best weapons for offense, it's not unusual that Ewoks are among your best teams left for D. Maybe it doesn't happen at your higher GP level though.- 5.1, there are no ewoks, and bh are a misyake when they appear, OR as well.
His top GP amount just games the systwm more likely. Sure he plays smart but that roster isn't 'the best in div 1'
GAC needs a rework
/thread "Lysandrax;c-2144183" wrote:
"Rath_Tarr;c-2144181" wrote:
"Fhoenix;c-2144177" wrote:
:D two no shows and a half attempt... yep ... totally better at GAC @Rath_Tarr
Yep, better at GAC. All you have shown there is opponents' choices.
We don't control opponent selection or activity but we do control our roster, strategy and tactics and he has done so well enough to win all 12 matches with full clears and probably all feats, judging by his score.
If you're getting 1956 in GAC it is because of your opponent. They have set awful teams.
Check that GAC history again. You're not reading it right. They actually set normal defense for their GP range. I see both DR + Malak, JKR lead jedi, NS, Geos, Padme + GR, Shaak Ti + clones, GG + sep droids, Nute teams etc. They are not setting weak teams for their GP range. Yet Bus 74 still undersized most battles.
When you score 1950+ repearedly it's because you carefully theory crafted how to beat the defenses you're up against with undersized squads, built those squads and single characters just strong enough to do their job, modded them well to serve their purpose and saved them for offense. Bus 74 excels in this."vincentlondon;d-233173" wrote:
Looks like the top 10 players in Kyber division 1 have bunch of Relic 0 toons again.
Does that mean if we have bunch of R7 toons we have no chances?
If you put R7 on a character that will serve its purpose in GAC with g13 / R0 you definitely hurt your chances to win in GAC. However, enjoy your wins in arenas, TBs etc.
