So looking at division 2, 1000 points per win and 1952 points max per round. So 35424 points max from all rounds and kyber threshold is 35500? Seems like a mistake was made somewhere.

What about the Feats as you do all 3 rounds.Probably a couple of thousand points there if you got them all

Ought to be the same level of difficulty in every Division, the Divisions are only there to help with matchmaking.

"ZAP;c-2051880" wrote:"TVF;c-2051782" wrote:"TaTaKaS;c-2051779" wrote:I was in div 2 the first 2 championships and got in with 10-2 on both. Mostly full clears and a lot of feats. Well this points out the other problem with the leagues. That first GAC I faced max D almost every round so it was very difficult to clear almost every round. With opponents that place less D, it's way easier.Regardless, under this setup (5v5, no fleets), it's way easier to get to Kyber under Div. 2. Serious question, do you think it’s fair that I could get into kyber in div 3 going 8-4 and not even getting close to kyber with that record in div 2?Is it fair that it's not the same? No, very unfair.Is it fair that you dont get into kyber with 4 losses? That seems pretty fair to me, 4 losses shouldnt get kyber.

"Lysandrax;c-2051898" wrote:"ZAP;c-2051880" wrote:"TVF;c-2051782" wrote:"TaTaKaS;c-2051779" wrote:I was in div 2 the first 2 championships and got in with 10-2 on both. Mostly full clears and a lot of feats. Well this points out the other problem with the leagues. That first GAC I faced max D almost every round so it was very difficult to clear almost every round. With opponents that place less D, it's way easier.Regardless, under this setup (5v5, no fleets), it's way easier to get to Kyber under Div. 2. Serious question, do you think it’s fair that I could get into kyber in div 3 going 8-4 and not even getting close to kyber with that record in div 2?Is it fair that it's not the same? No, very unfair.Is it fair that you dont get into kyber with 4 losses? That seems pretty fair to me, 4 losses shouldnt get kyber.Totally agree, I should have never gotten into kyber with 4 losses in div 3. Something is wrong with their calculations.It’s worse though, getting into kyber with 4 losses in div 3 and not getting into kyber with 1-2 losses in div 2 is just too far apart I think.

Kyber should be the same in each division. It should take approximately the same win-loss ratio regardless of your division. Probably a 9-3 or 8-4 with most of the feats and high scores

Kyber threshold correct for division 2?

Deathbleeder
5 years ago
What about the Feats as you do all 3 rounds.
Probably a couple of thousand points there if you got them all
Rath_Tarr0
5 years ago
Ought to be the same level of difficulty in every Division, the Divisions are only there to help with matchmaking.
Lysandrax58
5 years ago
"ZAP;c-2051880" wrote:
"TVF;c-2051782" wrote:
"TaTaKaS;c-2051779" wrote:
I was in div 2 the first 2 championships and got in with 10-2 on both. Mostly full clears and a lot of feats.

Well this points out the other problem with the leagues. That first GAC I faced max D almost every round so it was very difficult to clear almost every round. With opponents that place less D, it's way easier.

Regardless, under this setup (5v5, no fleets), it's way easier to get to Kyber under Div. 2.

Serious question, do you think it’s fair that I could get into kyber in div 3 going 8-4 and not even getting close to kyber with that record in div 2?

Is it fair that it's not the same? No, very unfair.

Is it fair that you dont get into kyber with 4 losses? That seems pretty fair to me, 4 losses shouldnt get kyber.
ZapZapZipZap
5 years ago
"Lysandrax;c-2051898" wrote:
"ZAP;c-2051880" wrote:
"TVF;c-2051782" wrote:
"TaTaKaS;c-2051779" wrote:
I was in div 2 the first 2 championships and got in with 10-2 on both. Mostly full clears and a lot of feats.

Well this points out the other problem with the leagues. That first GAC I faced max D almost every round so it was very difficult to clear almost every round. With opponents that place less D, it's way easier.

Regardless, under this setup (5v5, no fleets), it's way easier to get to Kyber under Div. 2.

Serious question, do you think it’s fair that I could get into kyber in div 3 going 8-4 and not even getting close to kyber with that record in div 2?

Is it fair that it's not the same? No, very unfair.

Is it fair that you dont get into kyber with 4 losses? That seems pretty fair to me, 4 losses shouldnt get kyber.

Totally agree, I should have never gotten into kyber with 4 losses in div 3. Something is wrong with their calculations.

It’s worse though, getting into kyber with 4 losses in div 3 and not getting into kyber with 1-2 losses in div 2 is just too far apart I think.
GladOS-013
Hero+
5 years ago
Kyber should be the same in each division. It should take approximately the same win-loss ratio regardless of your division. Probably a 9-3 or 8-4 with most of the feats and high scores
Nikoms565
5 years ago
"jkray622;c-2052054" wrote:
Kyber should be the same in each division. It should take approximately the same win-loss ratio regardless of your division. Probably a 9-3 or 8-4 with most of the feats and high scores

Agreed. 100%.

As an aside, I find it amusing that CG can't even get the scoring system balanced - and people still insist/aasume that matchmaking miraculously is.
TaTaKaS
5 years ago
Matchmaking is more than good... I have fought 48 people until now and every single roster has been very close to mine.
drathuk916
Rising Novice
5 years ago
Really??! I was in division three for the first two. Last two in division 2. To expect more points then are available in rounds is laughable.
drathuk916
Rising Novice
5 years ago
Oh I believe you. Just can’t believe they think it makes sense.
TaTaKaS
5 years ago
That's good. Kyber is for the best not for everybody... Last gac I got into Kyber with 8-4 record. In the first three I got into Kyber with 10-2.I think 11 wins SHOULD be the minimum no matter how many banners you have.