"SerWulfgar;c-2339981" wrote:
"Ultra;c-2339948" wrote:
"SerWulfgar;c-2339945" wrote:
B) with temporary ban (this is definitive zero, right???)
I think temporary bans are fine on case-by-case basis
I'm thinking of players who were knowingly exploiting stuff here, and not hacking the game or modifying battles illegally
No, let's not cross that line for various reasons.
I say it is extremely unlikely for a player to get reported by another player for finding exploitable bugs. If a player exploits a bug that has been red-flagged by CG or EA (we have a half-functioning website for that) then no, temporary ban is not acceptable, and if we are talking about an exploit that has not been acknowledged by EA/CG (and is not a hack or modifciation either) then I see no reason to punish the player at all.
But I really do appreciate your effort to relativize LD-s negotiation with the cheaters without actually mentioning his name, while partly-quoting a post that directly called him out on it. Spectacular work.
lol I'm not trying to "relativize" LD's thing and I've always expressed dissatisfaction and disappointment over the whole thing
I'm not going to defend LD over it, or am I here to defend him (he can speak for himself)
I am thinking of the daily challenges sim bug, that a bunch of players, in secret, were exploiting where you could sim any weekly challenges an extra time, so when Zeta mats were first released, as part of the fleet challenges, some players were simming it 3 times, knowingly exploiting the bug without CG's knowledge while keeping it secret
