Leviathan isn’t pushing the meta…

"AlexanderG;c-2431799" wrote:

"Ryanh1315;c-2431795" wrote:

"AlexanderG;c-2431786" wrote:

I mean, if you're going to put your fingers in your ears and ignore all of the issues with this fleet, by all means.

What are you talking about? All I did was demonstrate that it's already capable of taking number 1.

It's probably not WAI, may well get tweaked, or needs Lev owners to get the strategy right. Or a mix of the aforesaid.

Just seemed a bit premature to get the pitchforks out..

You guys definitely need to be paid by CG or else there are some real problems of your coding.

Both LV and Leviathan feels the same no damage no enjoyable gaming experience (except at least Leviathan has some amazing animations I'll give you that) waiting for your Ult and while enemy 4* Exec, Prof could beat your 7* Leviathan with ease you just suffering and waiting for Mark VI to instakill at least one ship but still beaten by Holdo beaten by Fennec like LV. CG just always makes the most popular or wanted character, ship to be not the best make it's requirements investments very high and make it weaker because they already know that players will get that unit because they love it from the movies, comics etc. If bug fixing the only thing Leviathan needs to be "Meta Defining" then I will come here and say sorry, but I don't think just bug fixing will make the Leviathan what it needs to be.

I don't think without a buff or some kind of rework like when you control enemy Executor, Profundity and use it's mass assist it doesn't require for your ship to be BH - Rebel. If they do that it's not a bug fix, it's a mini rework.