Merrin S1 locked behind g12?

Yes. It was covered in the Kit Reveal, link below
https://forums.galaxy-of-heroes.starwars.ea.com/discussion/262671/kit-reveal-merrin#latest

Oh lovely, so glad we get more pay walls
Thanks for the info

"LordOfVoids;c-2414622" wrote:
Oh lovely, so glad we get more pay walls

Hello.

I'm one of the usual suspects.

It's not a paywall.

Cheers.

"Ravens1113;c-2414616" wrote:
https://forums.galaxy-of-heroes.starwars.ea.com/discussion/262671/kit-reveal-merrin#latest

Yes, this is WAI and the usual suspects on the forums have no problem with CG starting this precedent.

One time is not a precedent, but I hope it becomes one!

They did specifically mention they wanted to avoid a paper zombie kind of situation that some people took advantage of, so I think it’s fair it’s locked behind a G12 minimum.

Paper zombie was the best zombie.

"MasterSeedy;c-2414637" wrote:
Paper zombie was the best zombie.

I preferred copper zombie.

"TVF;c-2414632" wrote:

"Ravens1113;c-2414616" wrote:
https://forums.galaxy-of-heroes.starwars.ea.com/discussion/262671/kit-reveal-merrin#latest

Yes, this is WAI and the usual suspects on the forums have no problem with CG starting this precedent.

One time is not a precedent, but I hope it becomes one!

As you said on the other thread at one point - False.

It’s quite literally unprecedented by the definition -

un·prec·e·dent·ed
/ˌənˈpresədən(t)əd/
adjective
never done or known before.

So that makes this a precedent that could be pointed to in the future.

precedent
2 of 2
noun
prec·​e·​dent ˈpre-sə-dənt
1
: an earlier occurrence of something similar
2
a
: something done or said that may serve as an example or rule to authorize or justify a subsequent act of the same or an analogous kind
a verdict that had no precedent
b
: the convention established by such a precedent or by long practice
3
: a person or thing that serves as a model

Well done.

I hope it serves as an example or rule to authorize or justify a subsequent act of the same or an analogous kind.

"TVF;c-2414648" wrote:
Well done.

I hope it serves as an example or rule to authorize or justify a subsequent act of the same or an analogous kind.

Why though? That just seems like a spiteful move/statement? How does it serve to make the game or experience better?