"chionophile;c-2200924" wrote:
"Lor_San_Teka;c-2200906" wrote:
"DarthGlovoc;c-2200882" wrote:
"Lor_San_Teka;c-2200877" wrote:
I'm not a CG apologist by any stretch, but I don't see how the word "also" changes anything. The original descriptions was "if all allies are IT..." How does "also" change the makeup of 2 attackers, 1 tank, 1 support?
The also means that to receive any of the three lower clauses (offense, insight stacks, and revives) you have to have 2 attackers, 1 tank, and 1 support. It reduces his plug n play viability as a leader and restricts him to ITs, so if someone doesn't have full ITs and zetad his lead under miscommunicated pretenses they want their zeta back.
Yeah, still I don't get it. Leadership is role-specific for the 4 spots. Then Zeta adds some nice things for a full IT squad (which means those roles are still needed).
If I was gonna be upset about something, it's that his leadership is useless in dumb 3v3.
Trust me, I'm fully open some justified CG outrage. Just I don't see the interpretation here other than "bad reading comprehension."
Without the "also," it's easily read as two separate clauses. If all allies are troopers, you get this. If allies are specific composition, you get this. If both, you get both.
You can't get the second half without the first half, though, which isn't obvious without the "also" in there.
Perfect, thank you for this break down.
Capital Games Team
