Never do 3vs3 again

I really hope the new content delivery system is 3v3 specific just for the laughs.

"TVF;c-2109604" wrote:
I really hope the new content delivery system is 3v3 specific just for the laughs.

I’m all for it if the new system delivers 3 times the content, but wait, 3x0=0

Uh oh

Do it without ships.

"MightyWizard;c-2109903" wrote:
Do it without ships.

Sorry, ships are part of the game and should always be included.

Every. Single. New. Meta.

People complain about being matched up with it. Too bad. That's the game model. People work hard or spend hard to get it, and yeah, they do so for an advantage over those that don't. This time you were given months and months of advance notice, and if you were paying any attention to the Star Wars landscape late last year, you could have started prepping even earlier. That's what I did.

Get your own meta character, or develop a counter, and stop asking CG to fix your problems for you.

3v3 is my favorite game mode ?‍♂️

"TVF;c-2109931" wrote:

"MightyWizard;c-2109903" wrote:
Do it without ships.

Sorry, ships are part of the game and should always be included.

but the game wasn't designed for ships!!!

"CrispyFett;c-2110779" wrote:
.. and these battles seem to be more dependent on luck and RNG than any strategy. Or I timeout. The 5 minute cap needs to go in PvP

If that is the case here or anywhere else in the game then the problem is your squad, your tactics or both.

"CrispyFett;c-2110779" wrote:
I agree with the original OP. 3v3 just not fun for me. As others have said, perhaps if we had an area to mess around with 3v3 synergies it would be better. But as it stands, the game is based on 5v5 synergies, and these battles seem to be more dependent on luck and RNG than any strategy. Or I timeout. The 5 minute cap needs to go in PvP

Luck? Not really. You just have to think differently. Hell, if anything this is LESS random. My jawas have about a 75% success rate in 5v5 vs Geonosians, in the last two 3v3s (ie: the two rounds so far and the entirety of the last one) they've been 100%. This latest round I even won without losing anyone against a relic Brood Alpha.

The ticket is not to put down bad defenses, or else bad teams can beat you and good teams can flawlessly beat you. It's also not to put down your best defenses, or else your opponent gets to handpick the counter team to beat you and you have nothing left for offense.

The ticket is to put down defenses that are okay enough that they'll do damage and maybe kill an opponent. If you can get a defensive win, even better. This means they won't roll you over and it saves your best teams to one-shot theirs.

I think the reason people have trouble with 3v3 is that it depends on you having a wide roster with some depth, while the other areas of the game encourage you to have a narrow, tall roster with a couple specialized teams. They hate it because it's the only mode in the game that doesn't reward them.

The good news is that you can always work on other teams. Get yourself a couple G11 teams, they punch up a lot better than you'd think.

"TVF;c-2109604" wrote:
I really hope the new content delivery system is 3v3 specific just for the laughs.

Well, one of the complaints against 3v3 is that there is no game mode for 3v3 so players can't really practice without losing actual GAC battles

I would love a 3v3 focused game mode on top of whatever else they can quickly produce with these new tools