New conquest event feedback

"Kyno;c-2233698" wrote:

"FerociousPanda;c-2233580" wrote:

"Kyno;c-2233560" wrote:

"ShaggyB;c-2233539" wrote:

"Kyno;c-2233457" wrote:

"ShaggyB;c-2233448" wrote:
Id also say the crate is too hard to get.

I know you dont need all the feats... but i still feel like im down to the few i vant do and the few that are largely annoying to do without said needed counter.

Think lower the amount of feats needed to get to red crate or up the number of tokens a feat grants.

Sucks to have 3 starred it all and yet not be there

Need is a strong word.

From your other post, knowing you are close doesnt help you get it. You still need a proper plan and proper execution, which can be done without a counter.

It would be a great thing and much appreciated, but much like the argument for hiding scores on GAC, if you just plan to do everything in your power to do it, knowing (or not) changes nothing.

Difference is without the counter i dont know if i need to rethink, remod or just tweak a move or two.

So yes need is the correct term.

Just like scoring in GAC, you can do all of that before hand in your plan, and go in expecting that you need to 100%maximize your effort.

Players are doing it without a counter, so no need is not the correct term.

I am not arguing not to get it.

Someone: I need food, I haven't eaten in three days

Kyno, probably: People have survived more than three days without food, so no need is not the correct term

This is such a ludicrous semantical argument. Can you really not see a situation where we need the counter so we know whether or not our strategy is working? Maybe I removed 699% turn meter in the battle, just falling short, and getting a bit better rng would have gotten me the feat, so my strategy is sound. Or maybe I only removed 300%, so I need to use a different team comp. So yes I do need a counter, and it doesn't matter whether or not other players have been doing it without one.

Wrong.

Here you go:

I need a hotdog on a bun.

Here is a hotdog.

No I need the bun.
--------
Need is a strong word for the current scenario. It can be done without it, and the preference is to have it, but it is not needed.

But kyno removal of the bun makes it not the standard idea of what a hot dog is.

In most of the world, a "hot dog" is recognized as a sausage in a bun. The variation of meat is common, turkey dog, beef, etc.

The bun is some what constant. Thrre are cases where it is swapped for something else, most famous being the dipped and stick we know as a corndog.

But yes if the average person asks for a hot dog the bun is expected and there for considered a needed part of the equation.