"scuba;c-2442892" wrote:
"Drathuk916;c-2442888" wrote:
I see all sides. Yes there will definitely be players adversely affected by these packs who cannot afford the packs or choose not to buy for other reasons (devotion to ftp or not wanting to reward cg at this time with cash).
I definitely feel they should not be shamed for their disagreement with the packs. If I was a 4-6 million account and couldn’t or wouldn’t spend the money on sk, rey, slkr and my opponents in gac didn’t usually have all three I’d be annoyed.
That all said, I do agree these are helpful to attract new players or convert existing ftp players into paying players.
Well if they are doing it right, they shouldn't be their opponents much longer.
True but is acknowledging the p2w aspect actually going to make those who choose not to spend feel better about this?
Cg obviously needs more revenue streams to keep this game going and high end guilds need the progression of sub 8-10 million accounts to be faster. So I don’t personally disagree with the bundles at all.
Though I do wish this was coupled with a free change that sped up progression for the early game to the early end game accounts. I don’t have a definition of early end game btw as I assume each person feels differently about what that means.
Capital Games Team
