Non GL vs GL
I have been playing this game from the beginning. Why. WHY are you pairing non GL rosters with GL rosters in GAC. It is impossible! I'm raging and proud of it because I'm right. Come at me you cowards...
Forum Discussion
"Kyp_Durron88;c-2243017" wrote:"DarjeloSalas;c-2242892" wrote:"Kyp_Durron88;c-2242778" wrote:
Yeah that's me. If you're right I won't deny it. How am I to blame? I was being paired with GL opponents when I didn't have DR, Malak, Watt, GAS, etc. That's insane. It stands to reason that GL rosters should not be paired with non GL rosters. I get that my GP is inflated, but they can change the algorithm. I shouldn't be punished for moving the ball forward on characters I want to use.
You're making it sound like having loads of r7 toons is a bad thing. I worked hard for those. And besides, whether r5 or r8, GLs swat them all away like they are nothing.
Having loads of r5+ is a bad thing if the result of that is you getting smashed in GAC all the time. And you’re to blame because you’ve chosen to take STH to r7, Boba Fett to r5 for example. They are contributing nothing of note to your roster for other game modes and are not an effective use of resources when it comes to GAC.
Developing a roster for certain game modes is not a new thing. Before SLKR, if people wanted to excel in HSTR they needed certain teams (resistance, JKR led Jedi and Shaak Clones, for example). If people developed a roster that didn’t have those teams, was it reasonable for them to complain that they could never bag top rewards in a raid that pretty much required them? Same goes for TB. Back in the Hoth days, we needed to develop our IT, BH, Rogue 1 and Phoenix to get the best possible rewards. Again, if people chose not to develop those teams, could they complain that they weren’t performing at the top level? GAC is another game mode that “requires” a particular focus on roster development. Plow your own furrow at your peril.
But let’s take your request for the algorithm to stop matching GL owners with non GL owners to its logical conclusion. Who would it be fair for you to be matched with? I don’t have any way of checking this, but I’d imagine people with 40 r5+ toons and no GL are pretty thin on the ground and their number will only decrease as time progresses. What happens if you take another 20 toons to r5 or higher and still don’t unlock a GL? Should you continue to be matched with non GL owners? Even if their roster is completely over powered by yours?
There are plenty of people who already agree with me. I don't need any of you to validate my argument, nor can anybody tell me I am wrong.
And that doesn't make your point any more valid. Obviously the people who made equally wrong choices are going to side with the argument that favors them.
The TB comparison has a fair point. If you want Wat shards, you gear Geos even if your preferred pet project at the moment would be Rogue one. Similarly, GLs are the PvP meta, if you want to do well in a PvP game mode, you take KRU to r7 (and the other requirements), not STH.
