Plz hide ga opponent's results

Agree, right now there is no incentive to put good teams on defense. Just save your 6 or 8 strongest teams, do some simple math, and you almost can’t lose.

Use good strategy and none of that matters. I've won my last 8 GA's in a row and have gotten 1st every time

"TooOldForThis;c-1912290" wrote:
Agree, right now there is no incentive to put good teams on defense. Just save your 6 or 8 strongest teams, do some simple math, and you almost can’t lose.

They can lose if you put good teams on defense.

Knowing how many points you need doesnt make the battle easier.

"ikki84;d-208948" wrote:
The player who attacks second has too much advantage, knowing how many points he needs, if he can fail some battles etc. Plz hide the results until the end of attack phase to make a more balanced battle

Good idea, I like the fog of war concept! It would remove the “waiting game” where both opponents hold their attacks for as long as possible to have the opponent hit first.

"Kokie;c-1912294" wrote:
Use good strategy and none of that matters. I've won my last 8 GA's in a row and have gotten 1st every time

I’m guessing it had more to do with your Malak at a relatively low GP than your strategy...

Let's do this and then wait for the thousands of complaints about it :D

There was a debate regarding this topic during the exhibition. Going 1st/2nd isnt that important. If you dont want to go first, just wait

"Khezmell;c-1912310" wrote:
There was a debate regarding this topic during the exhibition. Going 1st/2nd isnt that important. If you dont want to go first, just wait

This has been debated since at least January or February if I remember right. There is a slight advantage to going second, but not big enough to merit a dedicated effort at changing it.

It’s more along the lines of: my opponent cleared my board averaging 59 points per match. I have 3 matches left and I need to get 181 to win. I’m going to try this undersized team instead of using an assured 58 point win with a full sized, better geared team.

Over the course of GA, I’ve won a couple matches doing this, but it didn’t alter my strategy drastically.

I disagree that there is no advantage to attacking 2nd, but I think waiting to attack is part of the strategy. I like it the way it is, I don't want my opponent's actions hidden from me until the end.

My strategy is to attack as efficiently as possible. It doesn't deviate whether I attack first or not. The only difference with going second is I have a better idea if I'll win or not.