PSA: Chase drop rates have been lowered

Was it possibly something to do with the 3 star unlock? Where as normally its 4 star?

To everyone at CG who knows this issue exists but fails to talk about for fear of potential legal reprisal (and I believe there is some potential legal issues that CG is attempting to avoid) you are cowards. Anyone here is welcome to disagree with me as that’s fine but CGs failure to address this issue shows a lack of respect to its customer base and is tantamount to pure chicken-shit. If you think I’m going to spend anymore on crystals during this galactic chase you are asinine. What a bunch of daft cabbages. @CG_Tusken_Meathead care to actually communicate with the community? Doubt it…I see you fit in nicely with these devs. GLU and CG are just peas in a pod.

"Ralakili0383;c-2351894" wrote:
Still no communication. Ultra and his empty promises..

I said i pinged them

I said i'll try to get them to make a post (via messaging them)

That's all i can do

I can't barge in to their houses and make them post things they don't want to

They can ignore my pings if they want

They can choose to not follow-up if they want

I'm not promising anything here, bro

"DarjeloSalas;c-2351902" wrote:

"Morgoth01;c-2351873" wrote:
Honestly what to trust here? They’ve just shown they are happy to lower the drop rate with announcement or acknowledgment, what’s to say it will be 3% this time and not 2% as this is just a 4* unlock?

I would guess it remain 3%, but we have now way of knowing or basis for proper planning.
Best bet if you really want the ship is to hoard and then come on here for data sharing to figure out the actual drop rate and from there plan during the event…

The other 2 ships were also 4* unlocks so I don’t see why this one will be different to the 3% we observed before.

The other two were 3* unlocks

Galactic Chases should be 4 star unlocks, the previous two were exceptions.

"Ultra;c-2351906" wrote:

"Ralakili0383;c-2351894" wrote:
Still no communication. Ultra and his empty promises..

I said i pinged them

I said i'll try to get them to make a post (via messaging them)

That's all i can do

I can't barge in to their houses and make them post things they don't want to

They can ignore my pings if they want

They can choose to not follow-up if they want

I'm not promising anything here, bro

Girrl you need to barge in to them houses! Otherwise they will never take your pings seriously.

The Chase has already started some time zones. Events server is also approximating a 3% drop rate (although granted, nowhere near enough data yet).

CG clearly doesn’t feel required to tell us anything. Based on the unexpectedly long turnaround time to a seemingly obvious answer, they may have received this recommendation from their legal team.

It seems we aren’t going to get an answer at this point.

"NormalSizedAnnie;c-2351967" wrote:
I’d spam the mess out of some personal and work email addresses.

There's a reason they don't let just anyone be a mod.

"StarSon;c-2341961" wrote:

"Wrathe;c-2341960" wrote:
I'm just surprised no one has been slapped in the face yet. :wink:

Someone accusing CG of a "slap in the face" is also assuming this was done on purpose. Given CG's track record, it was probably completely accidental. They just aren't smart enough to have noticed they did it so they could tell us about it.

I'm pretty sure violations of Google play requirements is the same whether on purpose or not.

"UncleOnceler;c-2352050" wrote:

"StarSon;c-2341961" wrote:

"Wrathe;c-2341960" wrote:
I'm just surprised no one has been slapped in the face yet. :wink:

Someone accusing CG of a "slap in the face" is also assuming this was done on purpose. Given CG's track record, it was probably completely accidental. They just aren't smart enough to have noticed they did it so they could tell us about it.

I'm pretty sure violations of Google play requirements is the same whether on purpose or not.

How's it a violation of anything?