PSA: War Made Manifest wording

I know that certain other games - like Marvel Strike Force, which is very similar to SWGOH - sometimes make mistakes, but they almost always offer some form of in-game compensation for all affected players (or else just all players, period) when they make such a mistake. Wouldn't it be nice if CG did that for those of us who play Galaxy of Heroes who suffer due to the company's very preventable mistakes?

"Ravens1113;c-2358377" wrote:
Soooo is this WAI and the wording is wrong? Or the wording is correct and the mechanic is bugged….

The wording you are looking for is incompetent

"Ravens1113;c-2358377" wrote:
Soooo is this WAI and the wording is wrong? Or the wording is correct and the mechanic is bugged….

Since it is more difficult to keep them alive, they will of course correct the wording to match the ingame functionality. You should know CG by know

"Ravens1113;c-2358384" wrote:

"zatho;c-2358380" wrote:

"Ravens1113;c-2358377" wrote:
Soooo is this WAI and the wording is wrong? Or the wording is correct and the mechanic is bugged….

Since it is more difficult to keep them alive, they will of course correct the wording to match the ingame functionality. You should know CG by know

Oh I do, would just prefer them to communicate with us…oh wait…. ?

But right now you only show them that is does not matter what they communicate because anything will get twisted and taken out of context

"Ravens1113;c-2358447" wrote:

"zatho;c-2358389" wrote:

"Ravens1113;c-2358384" wrote:

"zatho;c-2358380" wrote:

"Ravens1113;c-2358377" wrote:
Soooo is this WAI and the wording is wrong? Or the wording is correct and the mechanic is bugged….

Since it is more difficult to keep them alive, they will of course correct the wording to match the ingame functionality. You should know CG by know

Oh I do, would just prefer them to communicate with us…oh wait…. ?

But right now you only show them that is does not matter what they communicate because anything will get twisted and taken out of context

Well what’s taken out of context? The in game wording says to have scion and nihilus in battle for 20 wins. The current mechanic of it though requires them to survive according to the PSA.

So asking if the wording is correct and it’s bugged, or it’s WAI but the wording is wrong; is not twisting anything. The PSA doesn’t specify that

That was in relation to your other posts where you accused the PSA to be unclear. You asked for communication, they communicated how the feat needs to be done. Totally clear.

"zatho;c-2358459" wrote:

"Ravens1113;c-2358447" wrote:

"zatho;c-2358389" wrote:

"Ravens1113;c-2358384" wrote:

"zatho;c-2358380" wrote:

"Ravens1113;c-2358377" wrote:
Soooo is this WAI and the wording is wrong? Or the wording is correct and the mechanic is bugged….

Since it is more difficult to keep them alive, they will of course correct the wording to match the ingame functionality. You should know CG by know

Oh I do, would just prefer them to communicate with us…oh wait…. ?

But right now you only show them that is does not matter what they communicate because anything will get twisted and taken out of context

Well what’s taken out of context? The in game wording says to have scion and nihilus in battle for 20 wins. The current mechanic of it though requires them to survive according to the PSA.

So asking if the wording is correct and it’s bugged, or it’s WAI but the wording is wrong; is not twisting anything. The PSA doesn’t specify that

That was in relation to your other posts where you accused the PSA to be unclear. You asked for communication, they communicated how the feat needs to be done. Totally clear.

I think Revans is asking the right questions here

Is the feat bugged or is the description incorrect is a question that needs to be addressed by CG

"Ultra;c-2358461" wrote:

"zatho;c-2358459" wrote:

"Ravens1113;c-2358447" wrote:

"zatho;c-2358389" wrote:

"Ravens1113;c-2358384" wrote:

"zatho;c-2358380" wrote:

"Ravens1113;c-2358377" wrote:
Soooo is this WAI and the wording is wrong? Or the wording is correct and the mechanic is bugged….

Since it is more difficult to keep them alive, they will of course correct the wording to match the ingame functionality. You should know CG by know

Oh I do, would just prefer them to communicate with us…oh wait…. ?

But right now you only show them that is does not matter what they communicate because anything will get twisted and taken out of context

Well what’s taken out of context? The in game wording says to have scion and nihilus in battle for 20 wins. The current mechanic of it though requires them to survive according to the PSA.

So asking if the wording is correct and it’s bugged, or it’s WAI but the wording is wrong; is not twisting anything. The PSA doesn’t specify that

That was in relation to your other posts where you accused the PSA to be unclear. You asked for communication, they communicated how the feat needs to be done. Totally clear.

I think Revans is asking the right questions here

Is the feat bugged or is the description incorrect is a question that needs to be addressed by CG

Does it really matter which one it is? They are not likely to fix it before the end of conquest, so telling us whether it is bugged or an incorrect description changes nothing with the fact that they need to survive to get the feat.

"ImaSmakya;c-2358473" wrote:

"Ultra;c-2358461" wrote:

"zatho;c-2358459" wrote:

"Ravens1113;c-2358447" wrote:

"zatho;c-2358389" wrote:

"Ravens1113;c-2358384" wrote:

"zatho;c-2358380" wrote:

"Ravens1113;c-2358377" wrote:
Soooo is this WAI and the wording is wrong? Or the wording is correct and the mechanic is bugged….

Since it is more difficult to keep them alive, they will of course correct the wording to match the ingame functionality. You should know CG by know

Oh I do, would just prefer them to communicate with us…oh wait…. ?

But right now you only show them that is does not matter what they communicate because anything will get twisted and taken out of context

Well what’s taken out of context? The in game wording says to have scion and nihilus in battle for 20 wins. The current mechanic of it though requires them to survive according to the PSA.

So asking if the wording is correct and it’s bugged, or it’s WAI but the wording is wrong; is not twisting anything. The PSA doesn’t specify that

That was in relation to your other posts where you accused the PSA to be unclear. You asked for communication, they communicated how the feat needs to be done. Totally clear.

I think Revans is asking the right questions here

Is the feat bugged or is the description incorrect is a question that needs to be addressed by CG

Does it really matter which one it is? They are not likely to fix it before the end of conquest, so telling us whether it is bugged or an incorrect description changes nothing with the fact that they need to survive to get the feat.

if they fix it, changing the description is a lot easier then messing up with the code.

"zatho;c-2358482" wrote:

"ImaSmakya;c-2358473" wrote:

"Ultra;c-2358461" wrote:

"zatho;c-2358459" wrote:

"Ravens1113;c-2358447" wrote:

"zatho;c-2358389" wrote:

"Ravens1113;c-2358384" wrote:

"zatho;c-2358380" wrote:

"Ravens1113;c-2358377" wrote:
Soooo is this WAI and the wording is wrong? Or the wording is correct and the mechanic is bugged….

Since it is more difficult to keep them alive, they will of course correct the wording to match the ingame functionality. You should know CG by know

Oh I do, would just prefer them to communicate with us…oh wait…. ?

But right now you only show them that is does not matter what they communicate because anything will get twisted and taken out of context

Well what’s taken out of context? The in game wording says to have scion and nihilus in battle for 20 wins. The current mechanic of it though requires them to survive according to the PSA.

So asking if the wording is correct and it’s bugged, or it’s WAI but the wording is wrong; is not twisting anything. The PSA doesn’t specify that

That was in relation to your other posts where you accused the PSA to be unclear. You asked for communication, they communicated how the feat needs to be done. Totally clear.

I think Revans is asking the right questions here

Is the feat bugged or is the description incorrect is a question that needs to be addressed by CG

Does it really matter which one it is? They are not likely to fix it before the end of conquest, so telling us whether it is bugged or an incorrect description changes nothing with the fact that they need to survive to get the feat.

if they fix it, changing the description is a lot easier then messing up with the code.

Just like the wrong Mando in the description last time...

Is the feat, just saw in Anhald's stream that his Sion died and the feat counted, so sometimes it matches the in game description and sometimes it doesn't