Q&A: Sandbagging Response

Just because the solution to a problem is the same whether it is intentional or not doesn't mean the difference is irrelevant. To say in one sentence that guilds that sandbag are underhand and deserve to have people leave, then in another say it doesn't matter why it happens is the same as just insulting every guild with non-mandatory participation in TW, which isn't a reasonable way of going about things. All the maths suggesting the advantage have assumed a drastic increase in success while also saying it happens almost all the time, which are two points that can't both be true, else most sandbagging guilds would just be matched up against other sandbagging guilds, their win rate goes down, they don't get the increase in zetas. It also assumes that if you don't sandbag you win exactly 50% of the time, but if a guild is committed enough to sandbag, it's committed enough to put in the organisation to win more than they lose.