Radio silence

"droidboyz;161253" wrote:
@Qeltar -
CJ_JohnSalera...on a side note, it's unfortunate you had to grab the soap box and take the floor as you did due to the calling out to your team and you. I commend your initiative and proactive replies. Keep up the work.

They weren't proactive, they were reactive. There's a difference - and that's kinda the point of this whole thread. It's also that difference that can improve the situation moving forward.

"ioniancat21;161595" wrote:

"Qeltar;161190" wrote:
I'm sorry, but I think it is reasonable for people who are paying dozens or hundreds of dollars a month to want some transparency.

First off, sorry for upsetting you over my distasteful comments about these fools but I felt it was well deserved. When people do awesome work, I am the first guy to give a pat on the back. Similarly, when people run shoddy, disorganized projects and then expect players to spend thousands, that irks me.

There's another free fan made Star Wars game in the Play Store called X-Wing Flight. The game is an excellent piece of work considering it's fan made with a shoestring budget and an ad to finance the project. I contacted the developer to see if I could donate money to make the ad go away and I also told him I'd tell everyone I knew to check it out.

On the flip side, I haven't spent one dime on SWGOH and it's simply because the prices don't match what we receive in return. We also have no transparency and overall, they're not very trustworthy....

I'm all for tearing the devs a new one, I've done it many times myself. But this isn't the way to go about it.

You don't flat out call them fools and then advertise another game on their forum.

That's not on.

If you want to criticize CG/EA you have to do so in a productive manner. E.g. 'The devs stuffed up in this instance because . . .' 'EA is greedy because . . .' Don't just hurl insults around.

"droidboyz;161672" wrote:

"Nikoms565;161599" wrote:

"droidboyz;161253" wrote:
@Qeltar -
CJ_JohnSalera...on a side note, it's unfortunate you had to grab the soap box and take the floor as you did due to the calling out to your team and you. I commend your initiative and proactive replies. Keep up the work.

They weren't proactive, they were reactive. There's a difference - and that's kinda the point of this whole thread. It's also that difference that can improve the situation moving forward.

@Nikoms565 -

Yes. Proactive.

Hence the response/feedback from us that play this game that John was open to inquire about.

That's a proactive approach.

Do your research.

have a nice day.

Reactive means reacting to something. E.g. Qeltar's thread.

Proactive means acting before the thread even existed. So the thread wouldn't have had to be made.

"cosmicturtle333;161676" wrote:

"droidboyz;161672" wrote:

"Nikoms565;161599" wrote:

"droidboyz;161253" wrote:
@Qeltar -
CJ_JohnSalera...on a side note, it's unfortunate you had to grab the soap box and take the floor as you did due to the calling out to your team and you. I commend your initiative and proactive replies. Keep up the work.

They weren't proactive, they were reactive. There's a difference - and that's kinda the point of this whole thread. It's also that difference that can improve the situation moving forward.

@Nikoms565 -

Yes. Proactive.

Hence the response/feedback from us that play this game that John was open to inquire about.

That's a proactive approach.

Do your research.

have a nice day.

Reactive means reacting to something. E.g. Qeltar's thread.

Proactive means acting before the thread even existed. So the thread wouldn't have had to be made.

@droidboyz - Please take note of Cosmicturtle's excellent explanation...and have a nice day. :)

"droidboyz;161697" wrote:

"Nikoms565;161680" wrote:

"cosmicturtle333;161676" wrote:

"droidboyz;161672" wrote:

"Nikoms565;161599" wrote:

"droidboyz;161253" wrote:
@Qeltar -
CJ_JohnSalera...on a side note, it's unfortunate you had to grab the soap box and take the floor as you did due to the calling out to your team and you. I commend your initiative and proactive replies. Keep up the work.

They weren't proactive, they were reactive. There's a difference - and that's kinda the point of this whole thread. It's also that difference that can improve the situation moving forward.

@Nikoms565 -

Yes. Proactive.

Hence the response/feedback from us that play this game that John was open to inquire about.

That's a proactive approach.

Do your research.

have a nice day.

Reactive means reacting to something. E.g. Qeltar's thread.

Proactive means acting before the thread even existed. So the thread wouldn't have had to be made.

@droidboyz - Please take note of Cosmicturtle's excellent explanation...and have a nice day. :)

@Nikoms565 -

I'm speaking in regards to @CG_JohnSalera proactive approach to his openess to hear from us.

It's a given his reactive openess to take the floor on this thread concerning OP comments.

I was born at night but it wasn't last night.

day's going great.

When I figure out what the hell you just said, I am sure I will come up with a crushing reply.

"droidboyz;161697" wrote:

"Nikoms565;161680" wrote:

"cosmicturtle333;161676" wrote:

"droidboyz;161672" wrote:

"Nikoms565;161599" wrote:

"droidboyz;161253" wrote:
@Qeltar -
CJ_JohnSalera...on a side note, it's unfortunate you had to grab the soap box and take the floor as you did due to the calling out to your team and you. I commend your initiative and proactive replies. Keep up the work.

They weren't proactive, they were reactive. There's a difference - and that's kinda the point of this whole thread. It's also that difference that can improve the situation moving forward.

@Nikoms565 -

Yes. Proactive.

Hence the response/feedback from us that play this game that John was open to inquire about.

That's a proactive approach.

Do your research.

have a nice day.

Reactive means reacting to something. E.g. Qeltar's thread.

Proactive means acting before the thread even existed. So the thread wouldn't have had to be made.

@droidboyz - Please take note of Cosmicturtle's excellent explanation...and have a nice day. :)

@Nikoms565 -

I'm speaking in regards to @CG_JohnSalera proactive approach to his openess to hear from us.

It's a given his reactive openess to take the floor on this thread concerning OP comments.

I was born at night but it wasn't last night.

day's going great.

Still reactive. Yet, appreciated

"J0K3R;161708" wrote:

"droidboyz;161697" wrote:

"Nikoms565;161680" wrote:

"cosmicturtle333;161676" wrote:

"droidboyz;161672" wrote:

"Nikoms565;161599" wrote:

"droidboyz;161253" wrote:
@Qeltar -
CJ_JohnSalera...on a side note, it's unfortunate you had to grab the soap box and take the floor as you did due to the calling out to your team and you. I commend your initiative and proactive replies. Keep up the work.

They weren't proactive, they were reactive. There's a difference - and that's kinda the point of this whole thread. It's also that difference that can improve the situation moving forward.

@Nikoms565 -

Yes. Proactive.

Hence the response/feedback from us that play this game that John was open to inquire about.

That's a proactive approach.

Do your research.

have a nice day.

Reactive means reacting to something. E.g. Qeltar's thread.

Proactive means acting before the thread even existed. So the thread wouldn't have had to be made.

droidboyz - Please take note of Cosmicturtle's excellent explanation...and have a nice day. :)

Nikoms565 -

I'm speaking in regards to CG_JohnSalera proactive approach to his openess to hear from us.

It's a given his reactive openess to take the floor on this thread concerning OP comments.

I was born at night but it wasn't last night.

day's going great.

Still reactive. Yet, appreciated

Agreed on both counts.

"ioniancat21;161803" wrote:

"J0K3R;161528" wrote:

"ioniancat21;161523" wrote:

"Dario;161240" wrote:
I have only one question. Are the credit challenges being looked at and being changed? There is still no response from anyone official why they nerfed them to the point of useless. Apart from this everything thing else is great.

You probably won't find that information here but I'd advise you go check out Reddit for that information...

Why so bitter? :#

Thanks for not taking this all so harshly, I'm not either. All I'm doing is calling it as I see it. EA could fold up their tent tomorrow morning and I wouldn't even sweat it. If Microsoft stopped making Office or Adobe stopped making The Creative Suite, then I'd be upset but this is a game.

Seems like ur a bit upset about reddit. More than ur last quote would imply... Thats all

"Dantefire;161352" wrote:
Someone name me a game in which developers actively participate on their forums each and every day. Each and every week, even. Not many. That's not their jobs. They hire people such as @EA_Jesse to do this, so they can do their jobs, which is develop and patch the game you're playing, to most likely continue working on other projects, and to have an actual life outside of work.

I already said in this topic that the devs of this game post very frequently on the Reddit forum. The only person who posts here is the community manager.

"Preemo_Magin;161809" wrote:
Put yourselves in the devs shoes. Whenever any of them post, there's a flood of questions, complains and then the invariable forum "mud" wars among users mixed in. In less than a page, if they respond, they end up having the entire agenda of the entire collection of frustations, vents, ideas and even the forum member personal wars all into one thread.

Lets be fair, they do that to themselves lol

They NEVER (at best relarely) give us any real info, they rarely comment (and when they do, its not real info. Its open to interpretation so that they can ignore what they said with deniability like when they told us grievous would be a more favorable rate, or faster to farm or whatever it was they said) or provide clarity to any questions concerns. So yea, when they decide its finally time to grace us with their presence, they get bombarded.

None of that would happen if they were transparent and were on here adressing/providing clarity.
We would not be left to interpret, guess, speculate, etc