Raid reward comparison based on data
I've done research of old raids data based on example I've founded. There is some rules of this research: CPit not included. Example to show what was lost for guilds who finished only HSTR. ...
Forum Discussion
"Badger_Diaz;c-2423509" wrote:"Notthatguyfrombefore;c-2423504" wrote:"Gawejn;c-2423499" wrote:
I really dont understand players who are trying to convince everyone that rewards from krayt are similar or even better. Why do you choose side against players and why not to have both things? Like choosing rewards and similar rewards like we used to have?
Because, if the overall rewards to a whole guild are better, then I, and others who were better off on the old system, should arguably suck it up for the greater good. If my guild gets more then we'll progress faster together TB and this and future raids, and that's better for every player in the game.
That makes no sense.
You’re happy to take a hit for the team because it pushes progression for everyone, rather than push for the rewards you were getting to be distributed to the entire team, which would push the guild much further?
Why would you do that?
If anything that attitude is holding the guild, the rewards system and the entire player base back.
Because it was never going to be the case that they were going to give everyone in the guild the sorts of rewards that the top 5 or even top 10 were getting. IMO chasing that kind of payout is a fool's errand.
CG set a precedent when they set sim rewards for HPit and HAAT to be the equivalent of 11th place in those raids. To think they would do anything different when they, effectively, put HSTR on sim with players only doing Krayt is naive.
