Regarding Heroine Bundle Purchases

"Geddre;15360" wrote:

"Pokebreaker;15282" wrote:

"Geddre;15241" wrote:
Pokebreaker - you and those like you need to understand something. Agreeing to "Terms of Service" is not the 100% shutdown you seem to think it is. Let's take this to extremes... Say they decided to change every one of the current characters to have abilities equal to Teebo and Night sister Acolyte. Then they released all new characters that actually do something, but they're pay only. Do you honestly believe they'd be able to hide behind TOS? Nope. Enforceability of something like that is entirely dependent on the userbases level of acceptance.

In this case they pushed to far. Tons of people are rightfully getting their money back and EA is feeling it. I don't give a flying leap what I agree to... if I buy a super powerful game item and they change it to be garbage, I'm not bound by the TOS. This not the same as buying gems and using them on a character that ended up getting worse. This is actually taking away the item you bought and replacing it with something else that has the same name. That's not legal no matter what the TOS says.

Lol, "those like me"? What, a responsible adult with self-control and the ability to read agreements BEFORE I agree?

ToS isn't meant to be a "Shut Down". It's meant to show you lazy folks that they (Dev team) reserve the right to change the game how they see fit, and YOU agreed for them to be able to do so. You whiners getting a refund from Apple or Google store doesn't mean the changes were "illegal", it just means that your refund request met the criteria of Apple/Google's policies. Last I checked, they are not game developers, nor do they represent a legal decision. It's like refund policies that stores have, versus that of which your credit card company offers its cardholders. (I bet many of you don't even know about the extra protection services your credit card offers on purchases).

Whining and having customer service actions work in your favor is NOT the same as taking the issue to court, where agreed terms ACTUALLY matter. You say it's not legal because you feel you were wronged, NOT because it's actually illegal.

Lol, wow... Touchy aren't you? You write well, but you've been taken to school on this thread sport. And please know, you're the whiner here. Just because you're taking your time with your posts doesn't change that. Spend less time on forums and more times at a real job and maybe you can afford to buy a character pack and see what it feels like to have your Lexus replaced with a Fiat.

This doesn't effect me either way it goes. I argue on principle alone. Seems you might fall into the group I previously described, seeing how you've come out of nowhere to write a lazy post to respond to me. You even took the cliche "I've got more money than you" route, which has NEVER been done before... Seeing how neither of us could verify each other's income and daily workload, it's as silly as making online threats of having your dad come beat me up.

By your reasoning, if a person has money, they MUST spend it in a silly manner. They aren't allowed to think like a responsible adult.

Thanks for the compliments though. I like to keep my writing honed.