You have about 50% chance of winning. They'll play and you'll lose or they'll not play and you'll win. If they're there, it's because they lost before against rosters close to yours.

"TVF;c-2392762" wrote:Can't please eveyone Just because you think the current GAC system is better than the old doesn't mean it can't and shouldn't be improved.

At least with the old matchmaking you didn't end up with a scenario where you have 0 control of the outcome.

There’s a big difference between assuming the outcome and controlling it.You control the outcome by doing the two things you do against every opponent, regardless of their GP. Set your defenses, and make your attacks.And just remember that if he’s 6.1 million GP facing off against a 1.8 million GP account, he’s doing something very, very wrong. Like not attacking at all.

"RodFarva34;c-2392766" wrote:At least with the old matchmaking you didn't end up with a scenario where you have 0 control of the outcome.Haha most of my opponents in the old system would completely disagree with you.

Remove post | EA Forums

perfidius44
Rising Newcomer
2 years ago
You have about 50% chance of winning. They'll play and you'll lose or they'll not play and you'll win. If they're there, it's because they lost before against rosters close to yours.
RodimusFarva
2 years ago
"TVF;c-2392762" wrote:
Can't please eveyone

Just because you think the current GAC system is better than the old doesn't mean it can't and shouldn't be improved.
RodimusFarva
2 years ago
At least with the old matchmaking you didn't end up with a scenario where you have 0 control of the outcome.
infidel2k
2 years ago
There’s a big difference between assuming the outcome and controlling it.

You control the outcome by doing the two things you do against every opponent, regardless of their GP. Set your defenses, and make your attacks.

And just remember that if he’s 6.1 million GP facing off against a 1.8 million GP account, he’s doing something very, very wrong. Like not attacking at all.
tvsfrink
2 years ago
"RodFarva34;c-2392766" wrote:
At least with the old matchmaking you didn't end up with a scenario where you have 0 control of the outcome.

Haha most of my opponents in the old system would completely disagree with you.
perfidius44
Rising Newcomer
2 years ago
"RodFarva34;c-2392760" wrote:
Doesn't change the fact that it's not fun for original poster.

Sure, but that’s not what their post was about.
RodimusFarva
2 years ago
Doesn't change the fact that it's not fun for original poster.
tvsfrink
2 years ago
Can't please eveyone
RodimusFarva
2 years ago
Lol, there is no controlling the outcome. You either win because they don't attack or get curb stomped. I fail to see how this makes for a good experience.
winterwolves
New Scout
2 years ago
"RodFarva34;c-2392766" wrote:
At least with the old matchmaking you didn't end up with a scenario where you have 0 control of the outcome.

Under the old system plenty of my opponents got matched against me and had no control over the outcome. I had managed my roster in a way that game me an advantage over most other players I got matched with.

I prefer not having to have such a tight control over my roster. I'm fine with the higher loss rate now. I stuck some extra gear on geos so I can earn guild tokens more consistently, for example. That extra gp with poor pvp use under the old system would have been a bad move.