Repeatable Events and High Tenacity
I'd first point out that I have already completed all feats in all 7 tiers of the current BH GC (so this doesn't come off as a "sour grapes" post). In repeatable events, please stop with the high ten...
Forum Discussion
"Mephisto_style;c-2194540" wrote:
scuba MetaThumper Nikoms565
I read the OP. It complained about BH GC and high tenacity. My reply is a solution. It is also the most valid solution. You will find many posts on the forums where I recommend to people using HK for his tenacity down. My most common is Thrawn to HK, but even Jawa Engineer then HK. It's the mechanics. Complaining about legit mechanics such as NPCs using high tenacity just like I do with my 174 tenacity Nest is not going to change any Dev decisions.
Get Dengar. I don't have Dengar, but that is the solution.
It would be funny if a Dev jumped in here and said,"If you guys can mod your Nest to 174, why can't we mod our NPC's to 174?"
Galactic Challenges are not meant for everyone to = win each week. You should steamroll some and you should struggle on others, unless your roster is just that awesome. Mine is not. Lots of missing feats this time, cause I don't have Dengar.
Oh, and @MetaThumper the answer to your question should be is your potency minus the statistical 15% base chance to resist a debuff after you have applied tenacity down.
"Nikoms565;d-238208" wrote:
I'd first point out that I have already completed all feats in all 7 tiers of the current BH GC (so this doesn't come off as a "sour grapes" post). In repeatable events, please stop with the high tenacity toons (or ships - ala Finalizer event). It only forces players to enter, open, then, when the needed debuff(s) don't stick, retreat, rinse and repeat. That does not make the event "better" or "more puzzly" - it just makes it rng-dependent, boring, and take longer than it should.
High speed or high health units, as a gear/relic "check" is understandable. But high tenacity is just a "time wall". Please stop implementing it in repeatable events.
OP is NOT asking for a "how to" on this event, it was a simple feedback on ALL repeatable events.
I simply stated that threads like this are a losing battle because many can't go with general feed back on ALL events and feel the need to provide a "how to" on which ever event is running, I didn't ask for a how to, and you still provided one.
So thanks for proving my point.
