"BasherBeau;c-2387580" wrote:
"CrispyFett;c-2387579" wrote:
They have said they are looking into the situation, but is it a "bug" or is it WAI?
Do you know what the I in WAI means? Because they literally said it was an "unintended interaction"
Thank you Captain Snarky. Fieldgulls put it into context better without being an arse:
"Fieldgulls;c-2387581" wrote:
It’s neither to me…it’s unintended consequence due to the lack of testing in the GAC environment. I couldn’t get past it either. It is a shame a unit with multiple omicrons for GAC wasn’t tested properly.
It appears that the omicron is WAI, however, its how the omicron operates under certain circumstances in GAC that is causing unexpected consequences due to CG's likely lack of testing and general incompetence.
The fact that TVF liked your post speaks volumes.
Cheers