Sick and tired of gac
I'm so tired of getting punished for being good at gac. I'm punching way above my gp constantly. How is there no metric to better place us within the skill rating? I'm constantly going against peo...
Forum Discussion
"Fingolfin26;c-2338931" wrote:"Ragnarok_COTF;c-2338930" wrote:"Fingolfin26;c-2338905" wrote:"Ragnarok_COTF;c-2338896" wrote:"Fingolfin26;c-2338862" wrote:
Yes and look at the matches, those were matches where there wasn't a significant gp and gl difference.
I'm not asking to always win. I'm asking for balanced matchmaking
Balanced means you win 50% of the time, imo. If you are better than most others at your GP, you're gonna hit some brick walls. You're also at a weird, mid-game level that seems to have a lot of efficient players such as yourself as well as casuals with more toys and roster bloat.
Speaking from my experience as well as others in the 250-1000 K1 range, GAC has never been more competitive and exciting.
Hey if they pair me with similar efficient rosters I'm fine with it, I don't mind fair competition.
Look though, that hasn't happened in multiple cycles
And how would one design a system to find such players? And how do we differentiate between you and the casual player with 2M more GP?
Start with their current system, then after you have measured people with skill ranking further refine matches. Take the number of gls, then go a step further number of gear 13s, then a step further average speed on a certain number of mods.
Why would they take all the “difficult” things to do in this game and make them irrelevant by not providing an advantage. I spend a lot of time farming mods and requirements for GL’s, why would I not be able to use that as an advantage over people who don’t bother with mods or GL’s.
If they use those and then only match people who put similar effort into those aspects of the game, what would be the point of doing them as they no longer provide any sort of advantage.
