Since Rey likely isn't a Jedi...

"Woodroward;c-1019378" wrote:

"Mullato;c-1019372" wrote:
Then provide proof of kylo ren ever having the sith tag. Actual proof.

If you can't do that then shutup about it and move on. Matter of fact if you can't provide proof then there no reason for you to even be arguing.

If you respond back with more delusional rambling without proof, then that just proves you are a troll.

So provide proof or just accept it. You have 3 ways you can respond to this.
1. Provide actual proof.
2. Respond back with more blah blah delusional rambling
3. Don't respond and move on.

The choice is yours, but my money is on option #2.

See that's where your logic is flawed. I don't care if people believe me, and I'll go out of my way not to give scoffers what they ask for.

I have tried to convince no one of anything, therefore I have no need to produce proof. However others ARE trying to convince me of something, and that means that proof is required.

So you can continue to troll me by posting in response without proof, or you can move on. The choice is yours. Are you a man of merit or a troll? Your choice reveals the answer to this question.

The burden of proof is on you. not me. YOU are the one insisting I adopt your understanding.

Lmao, that's not not how it works buddy.

You are trying to convince everyone that Something happened. Everyone else is saying that Nothing happened. You dont have to provide proof when Nothing happens.

This is like everyone telling you that trees can't jump, but you are telling us that one time you think you saw a tree jump. Who do you think needs to provide proof in that case? Exactly, if nothing happens there is no proof necessary, if something happens, then proof is necessary.

As it stands, this isn't looking good for the case or not of you being a troll or delusional. Because there is plenty of proof in this thread of that.