Since Rey likely isn't a Jedi...
...and instead will be a "balanced" Force user (per Luke in the EP8 teaser trailer), how will she be labeled when EA/CG finally brings her Force version to the game as a playable toon? Maybe it's time...
Forum Discussion
"ColonelTravis;c-1019491" wrote:Not admit that I might not be right?"Woodroward;c-1019469" wrote:
Do you think I only read the first sentence? That was addressing the whole paragraph. I paraphrased your entire paragraph into one sentence.
If I had been INSISTING that Kylo Ren had the Sith tag, I would have been INSISTING that other people agree with me.
Just awful.
This is the last time I'm responding to you because your arguments are horrible and I have a life and can't waste my time with you any more. But what you did was called, "making up ****." I write for a living. You do not know this, but I chose words carefully and for a reason. If I thought you were trying to insist that everyone agree with you, I would have written that. But, as I said, you have found something that was never written by me or implied. Just like you saw something that was never there. I hope you don't play poker because you are an easy tell.
Insisting X Is True and Insisting Everyone Agree That X Is True are not the same things. <--- see this?
I'd cut you some slack if you said something like, "you know, maybe my memory cannot be trusted like I think it can be" because even you should be able to see that for two days you have convinced no one. But you're too stubborn to do that and so far down this road now that to admit you might not be right is too humiliating for you.
I've said all along that I welcome being proved wrong, and would love to be proven wrong.
Not admit that I might not be right? No, that's not the case. However, I will not admit I am wrong with no proof being levied about it.
My response to you was to point out that what you said based on the actual rules of the burden of proof could only be true if your words were interpreted this way. Otherwise there was an inherent contradiction in them.
Maybe I was out of line to say you misinterpreted my words, it would have been more apt to say that your response was based on a misunderstanding of the concept of burden of proof (one that most people who are aware of the concept labor under), but I didn't misinterpret your words. I interpreted them the only way they logically could be given the circumstances.
