Slave I: Taunt is Silly
Is there any justification for CG to continue keeping the taunt on Slave I? The ship is an attacker and squishy. No taunt would also likely make a nice diff with Exec with some of the counters that ha...
Forum Discussion
"Ravens1113;c-2288794" wrote:"SnakesOnAPlane;c-2288766" wrote:"Ravens1113;c-2288749" wrote:"SnakesOnAPlane;c-2288730" wrote:"Gamorrean;c-2288727" wrote:
How has having a taunt for slave 1 anything to do with not being star wars lore?
Lets be honest, you just want less counters.
Let’s be honest, you still mad at CG for saying they gonna make less counters.
Remember when you claimed you were coming after the whales? 4 years later and how’s that working out for you? :D
He’s not wrong. You’re just upset because you don’t like Slave 1 getting destroyed so quick which makes executor not the exact powerhouse you paid for. I mean I get it, I don’t like the counter nerf CG is doing and think plenty of kits/lack of reworks are out of whack including executor itself showing clear lack of testing and massive overselling. But let’s call a spade a spade here lol.
I’m not using Slave I at this time and holding just fine. When I was using him I was holding just fine. Y’all just mad cause now you can’t easily beat Exec with Rebels with my new combo. And I could care less what I spend on this game. Don’t hate on rich folk. That’s discrimination!
Lmao wut? We are mad? Dude you’re the one making a rant post and pulling the ol’ “git gud pezent” when people are calling you on your contradictions lol. Oy vey…imagine someone making TVF look normal…or myself hahaha
??
