Slave I: Taunt is Silly
Is there any justification for CG to continue keeping the taunt on Slave I? The ship is an attacker and squishy. No taunt would also likely make a nice diff with Exec with some of the counters that ha...
Forum Discussion
"LordDirt;c-2289439" wrote:"Legend91;c-2289356" wrote:"LordDirt;c-2289339" wrote:"Legend91;c-2289255" wrote:"LordDirt;c-2289247" wrote:"Legend91;c-2289186" wrote:"DonPuto;c-2289177" wrote:
Why not use Slave I as a starter so it doesn't reinforce?
Yeah, stripping Piett off of all his mods so the Executor is downgraded to 187 speed (?) and S1 goes before it with it's 188 speed (168 + 20 from unique).
RIP Piett for squad usage.
R8 IG, dont fully upgrade mods on Piett
So HT, IG, S1 or RC, IG, S1? Next level starting lineups.
IG, HT, and RC. 1st reinforcement is S1, 2nd is XB.
Ok cool, might wanna read the initial post.
I dont lose S1 when he comes in with his taunt. My lineup wins 95%+ of the time. His taunt is not an issue.
Are you talking on offense or defense ?
