Slave I: Taunt is Silly
Is there any justification for CG to continue keeping the taunt on Slave I? The ship is an attacker and squishy. No taunt would also likely make a nice diff with Exec with some of the counters that ha...
Forum Discussion
"MaricSkywalker;c-2289470" wrote:
Yea a taunting attacker is flawed. There no situation you want slave 1 taunting. You could start in starting lineup- but then even with dropping mods off piett- he isn’t going first. So that 4* executor is beating you. Right now at 7* you’re forced to start ig-2000 so it goes before your piett-mod-stripper executor lands breach and you can call BH to assist the first turn. Which means you are calling slave 1 as a reinforcement- so he’ll taunt and die in 2 turns at r8. But if you wait the payout atleast you get off one Bomb. So there’s that.
We def need some adjustments to the executor fleet. Everything about this 7* lineup is wrong.
Thats all i want to say. Yesterday i lost hard 3 times when using the same line up with 4* Executor...ended up to use ig2000, win but not easy as my Executor still went 1st. CG should fix it or refund our crystals.
