So CG thinks this is exceptionally well??

"Whatelse73;c-2434602" wrote:

"Dawnsinger;c-2434595" wrote:
Pretty consistently with under-reliced teams. It works a bit better if half the team is sub relics than it does with a full relic team. They’re fairly consistent (if slow) about addressing that kind of issue.

"StarSon;c-2434587" wrote:

"Dawnsinger;c-2434579" wrote:
They probably care because of how low gear the NS can be and still beat Jabba outright, or give an easy two shot.

"StarSon;c-2434574" wrote:

"Ultra;c-2434551" wrote:

"DeusArt;c-2434536" wrote:

"Ultra;c-2434494" wrote:

"FurytheOriginal;d-265180" wrote:
But that win rate is NOT exceptionally well

So you are trying to say that its not a reliable counter to use?

So then you what's the issue if that counter is nerfed because it had an awful win rate to begin with

Because nerf could touch team performance against other teams. Plus one of the hype was the part that Merrin can kill full Jabba team. It forced me to whale to get her in first month on my girlfriend’s account. Now what, what sort of nerf it should be?

Unless the nerf is just “(excluding GLs)” or “if no GLs are present then…”

Did you read his post? He explicitly said the reason he whaled was to beat GL's, so I suspect he would be particularly upset if that were the nerf.

Also, unless there really is a team that is reliably beating Jabba, I don't understand why they care. They have never cared before about two shots or unreliable counters.

And how many times has that actually happened? As I said, they have never before cared about unreliable counters or two shots.

Just to reiterate what the OP said, it might be "consistent" for you. But, even in GAC insight, any Jabba lead (not counting clean ups) and a team with Merrin, there's a 13.25% win rate out of over 3600 battles. The only consistent with that is losing. The "success" rate just isn't there for them to be concerned about it.