"TVF;c-1738114" wrote:
"Ryanodo;c-1738109" wrote:
"TVF;c-1738103" wrote:
"Ryanodo;c-1738095" wrote:
And let's also not forget, they're using a forum which represents a percentage, and not even close to a majority, of the player base to vote on this. And, this forum has many F2P whiners, so I'm really glad their votes will help dictate whether or not the people that pay to improve their rosters, and thereby keep the game running, can use their full rosters. Brilliant. (if you don't pay to play at all it you're not helping the game, very important to remember that)
False.
Which part is false? You think the majority of the player base is on these forums and active? Or the P2P part? Either way, neither is false.
Without f2p, no one would pay for the advantage that they get by paying, and the game would die.
I respect your opinion, as that's probably true for players that are newer to the game. I don't consider myself competing with any F2P players at this point.
If they don't make money, they don't develop new content. When they develop new content, they should consider the people that fund their little adventure. But, maybe they did. With only F2P, the game would die much faster than without. If it were only P2P, the game would certainly live on, because there would be revenue. F2P boost their usage stats which boosts ad revenue, so I can see that being a +1 for F2P. BUT, the bottom line is the bottom line, and always will (and should) be, and to that point, it's important to hear from the people that contribute to that bottom line.
EA Staff
Capital Games Team