Forum Discussion
7 years ago
Hmm, you are making a lot of hasty assumptions instead of just staying with what I actually wrote^^.
1. Anakin, though I already mentioned him. He was the Chosen One, so he should actually be stronger than most other Jedi in the game (e.g. except for Yoda and the ancient Jedi). As much as I personally love the fact that Ezra is much stronger than him in any current Jedi team, it doesn't make "lore sense", does it?
2. The clones as a whole faction, their current synergy with Jedi (or rather lack of it besides for General Kenobi) is a joke. Imperial troopers are more viable in-game, though the clones were for sure the better fighters and had the better gear (remember Rex' comments on that in "Rebels"?).
3. Some tags should be added and/or updated; "Sith Empire" for the ancient Sith, "Mandalorian" for Canderous, Sabine, Saxon etc., add "Old Republic" tag to HK-47, "Smuggler" tag to some more characters such as STH, part of the Phoenix crew etc.
4. Might not be on your list, but Jawas as a whole faction have no meaning in the game anymore since they removed their need for the mod fights. I don't own them myself, but for those who have them, there should be some new event or assault battle to not make them completely worthless in the game.
5. I'm with you when it comes to General Grievous, like I said. But as I'm still disappointed by Cad Bane's rework, I wouldn't expect too much.
Have a nice day, too, and be sure to not put words into my mouth I never said ;) .
"Georgemi6;c-1700313" wrote:To clarify this one first, I have been a passive reader without an EA forum account for about one and a half years. Shortly I decided to comment here and there, too. Don't judge people on things you cannot know ;) .
And since your account is 10 days old, that either shows you don’t know what you’re talking about, or that you’re trolling.
"Georgemi6;c-1700313" wrote:No, actually I didn't. I said, quoting myself, that the game makers "focused on their own ideas of balancing". This was a value-neutral statement, I never said it was a bad thing at all. Actually, I told you that personally, I wouldn't get mad about it (and therefore don't care about the Windu issue neither) . And the reason is exactly this, the game makers had to choose practicability and the option for variety in characters and gameplay, over lore accuracy.
Additionally, you say that the game makers put no logic into character designs?
"Georgemi6;c-1700313" wrote:You really seem to take it personal when someone has a different opinion than you, lol. Where in my post did I state they wouldn't try what they could in cases where it makes sense and doesn't hurt their overall pattern of balancing in the game? Nightsisters are a unique faction and they turned out great in the game. Anyway could have been even closer to the lore if two of them weren't just nameless sisters, but actually Karis and Naa'leeth, who Mother Talzin had named the best of their warriors. ;)
Have you ever noticed that to beat night sisters, you kill Old Daka and they crumble, just like in TCW? Or that when Vader and Palpatine got reworked, they were perfect counters to the CLS teams of the time? Or that in the new TW bonuses, mace can instakill jango if he’s exposed Little stuff like that is hard to notice, but I suppose it’s hard to see when you have one eye closed ;)
"Georgemi6;c-1700313" wrote:If that was an argument, we would already have 3 or 4 Lukes in the game, though... what people request the most might be understandable on the one hand, but not necessarily means that the game itself would benefit from it so much. Nevertheless, I can of course give you some examples for reworks that would make sense from my point of view:
Also, you say other characters need a rework more than mace.... name one (besides grievous) that is both worse than mace and has been requested more than mace and I will believe you. And since you are logical, back it up with evidence. I don’t know if you’ve noticed, but mace and gg have been requested as reworks for literal years now.
1. Anakin, though I already mentioned him. He was the Chosen One, so he should actually be stronger than most other Jedi in the game (e.g. except for Yoda and the ancient Jedi). As much as I personally love the fact that Ezra is much stronger than him in any current Jedi team, it doesn't make "lore sense", does it?
2. The clones as a whole faction, their current synergy with Jedi (or rather lack of it besides for General Kenobi) is a joke. Imperial troopers are more viable in-game, though the clones were for sure the better fighters and had the better gear (remember Rex' comments on that in "Rebels"?).
3. Some tags should be added and/or updated; "Sith Empire" for the ancient Sith, "Mandalorian" for Canderous, Sabine, Saxon etc., add "Old Republic" tag to HK-47, "Smuggler" tag to some more characters such as STH, part of the Phoenix crew etc.
4. Might not be on your list, but Jawas as a whole faction have no meaning in the game anymore since they removed their need for the mod fights. I don't own them myself, but for those who have them, there should be some new event or assault battle to not make them completely worthless in the game.
5. I'm with you when it comes to General Grievous, like I said. But as I'm still disappointed by Cad Bane's rework, I wouldn't expect too much.
Have a nice day, too, and be sure to not put words into my mouth I never said ;) .
About SWGOH General Discussion
Discuss and share your feedback on Star Wars: Galaxy of Heroes with fellow players.81,416 PostsLatest Activity: 3 hours ago
Community Highlights
- CG_Meathead4 months ago
Capital Games Team
- CG_Meathead2 years ago
Capital Games Team
Recent Discussions
- 42 minutes ago
- 3 hours ago