Forum Discussion
- perfidius44Rising Newcomer
"Zanir;c-2284086" wrote:
We are pretty much ~6 years into the game. 9 capital ships. That's 1,5 capital ship a year, on average.
Could expect another capital less than a year from now.
Since the launching of ships late November 2016 with 3 capital ships, we had 6 more in about 5 years, so less than once a year. However, the last 4 where in pairs, so….fingers crossed for a new one in less than 6 months ! - NotRealUltraSeasoned Newcomer
"Nmwhite04;c-2284168" wrote:
I might have missed this, but when did CG sya they were returning R8 for Vader, JKL, and GAS? Has this been said? This is very important for my R8 piett and Boba lol
This month but not when this month "Ultra;c-2284169" wrote:
"Nmwhite04;c-2284168" wrote:
I might have missed this, but when did CG sya they were returning R8 for Vader, JKL, and GAS? Has this been said? This is very important for my R8 piett and Boba lol
This month but not when this month
Well it is August....- dougmichelNewcomer
"Nmwhite04;c-2284168" wrote:
I might have missed this, but when did CG sya they were returning R8 for Vader, JKL, and GAS? Has this been said? This is very important for my R8 piett and Boba lol
I would guess the day after the ship event ends, so you won't qualify without buying more R8 mats... "LordHel;c-2285045" wrote:
Executer as a requirement does not really make sense. With the GLs we are just in the Clone Wars era, the Executer doesn't fit in there. If at all you need the Malevolence, but I rather think that you won't need a ship for LV.
All the other GLs have a ship requirement; why wouldn’t LV be any different?- Also "doesn't make sense" isn't really relevant on a holotable, or in CG's offices.
"dogwelder79;c-2285111" wrote:
"Xcien;c-2285100" wrote:
"LordHel;c-2285045" wrote:
Executer as a requirement does not really make sense. With the GLs we are just in the Clone Wars era, the Executer doesn't fit in there. If at all you need the Malevolence, but I rather think that you won't need a ship for LV.
All the other GLs have a ship requirement; why wouldn’t LV be any different?
Why Executor instead of Malevolence, which would make more sense? "Because Executor is more expensive" is not a valid reason.
Why is it not valid? In fact it's the most likely reason."dogwelder79;c-2285114" wrote:
"TVF;c-2285112" wrote:
"dogwelder79;c-2285111" wrote:
"Xcien;c-2285100" wrote:
"LordHel;c-2285045" wrote:
Executer as a requirement does not really make sense. With the GLs we are just in the Clone Wars era, the Executer doesn't fit in there. If at all you need the Malevolence, but I rather think that you won't need a ship for LV.
All the other GLs have a ship requirement; why wouldn’t LV be any different?
Why Executor instead of Malevolence, which would make more sense? "Because Executor is more expensive" is not a valid reason.
Why is it not valid? In fact it's the most likely reason.
Malevolence is closer to this GL LV's era. Executor came much later.
CG doesn't care about that.- Konju2Seasoned Novice
"Zumwan;c-2284093" wrote:
I think Malevolence is more likely to be required. If it was Executor, the relic requirements for Vader would be just too much (and not comparable to JMK's)
JML & SEE did not have “similar” requirements. "dogwelder79;c-2285111" wrote:
"Xcien;c-2285100" wrote:
"LordHel;c-2285045" wrote:
Executer as a requirement does not really make sense. With the GLs we are just in the Clone Wars era, the Executer doesn't fit in there. If at all you need the Malevolence, but I rather think that you won't need a ship for LV.
All the other GLs have a ship requirement; why wouldn’t LV be any different?
Why Executor instead of Malevolence, which would make more sense? "Because Executor is more expensive" is not a valid reason.
To CG, it is. We got Wat for JMK for no reason other than to make it harder to get him.
About SWGOH General Discussion
Discuss and share your feedback on Star Wars: Galaxy of Heroes with fellow players.
78,224 PostsLatest Activity: 3 days agoRelated Posts
Recent Discussions
- 2 hours ago