The Revan story.
I’m happy they’ve announced Darth Revan. However... The story in hand? Does not make sense. I’ve been reading the Revan Time line came across interesting points and mentions of the characters. ...
Forum Discussion
"slickdealer;c-1801308" wrote:"CazNeerg;c-1800702" wrote:
Given the overall content of the in-game announcement, it seems more likely that the "reclaim" in the forum post is a mistake than that they are giving us dark ending Revan. The two are clearly inconsistent, and I would think the one that is both in game and more in depth would be more likely to be the accurate one.
Possibly, however there isn’t much ambiguity on the forum post.
“It will be a very difficult task to reclaim the Sith throne.”
This very clearly implies we are getting a Revan that was once on the Sith Throne.
It also makes sense from a journey perspective. This is why we need dark side Basty, Carth, Candy, and Jabroni.
Only HK47 would make sense if this was a pre-KOTOR Revan.
There is not any ambiguity in the in-game post either; it says claim instead of reclaim, and is clearly talking about pre-game Revan. The two posts are inconsistent, one of them has to be a mistake. And they could all make sense for a Journey that is about pre-game Revan, it's not necessarily the case that he has to actually appear himself in all the stages.
EDIT: All except Fallen Bastila. She will stick out as not making sense if it's pre-game Revan. But if it's dark ending Revan, Carth and Juhani might stick out just as much.
