"Devian;c-2332286" wrote:
"Darth_Etern4l;c-2332283" wrote:
"Devian;c-2332280" wrote:
"Darth_Etern4l;c-2332278" wrote:
It all depends on the lineup.
Just with every other GL - try defending with GMK without CAT.
Try LoVer with Maul against GK with CAT =D
So? A toon has to beat everything on offense to be good?
The most expensive GL? Well, he has to be on par with GK or at least to be strong against him but weak against... for example Rey, GK can beat everything and defend against nearly every team. What is a point of LV if he struggles against GK?
What really IS the point of LoVer in this game?
I think the problem is clear:
Capital Games got far too greedy with the Lord Vader requirements.
You can't have it both ways, CG. Either we have a balanced game where, as you stated at the outset of GL release, all GLs are roughly on par with each other,
OR you have ever increasing requirements encouraging more and more spending, and have to make the latest the greatest to compensate. (or risk a situation like Lord Vader with all the whales screaming about how underwhelming he is for the requirements)
I know which one the players will choose.
You need to keep your heads and stop thinking with just the customer's wallets- after all, wasn't the nerf to Darth Vader and GAS vs GLs to "ensure the future health of the game" ? It's all for nothing if you start making ever-increasing power tiers of characters.