"Gorgus;c-2257348" wrote:
"DarjeloSalas;c-2257277" wrote:
"Gorgus;c-2257212" wrote:
"DarjeloSalas;c-2256947" wrote:
"Wargoat;c-2256938" wrote:
I agree, there should be no join option. The entire guild should be placed in tw.
Hard disagree.
People have lives outside of this game.
A guild shouldn’t be punished if members have work commitments / vacation / family events / ill health.
I agree that guilds shouldn’t be “punished” for members needing to sit out wars. However, the current system punishes guilds for having full participation in TWs, which seems like a very perverse incentive structure. If the system has to favor one type of guild over another, it should favor the guild that gets 50 people signed up, IMO.
But we can’t propose to solve one matchmaking problem with a system that just creates another, surely?
Ideally, a new matchmaking system would be fair to all guilds. If such a system was feasible, that would obviously be the best solution. My point is that, if such a system is not feasible, any “matchmaking preference” should go to guilds that get high participation, since the point of guilds is cooperative participation. The current system incentives precisely the opposite and, in my view, is therefore the worst alternative.
Yep. They seem to be able to match up GAC pretty well. Thats because players are sorted by total GP. Someone in Div 1 won''t draw someone in Div 3 and get to set two GL's up front and gg. TW should be the same
