Forum Discussion
1,517 Replies
- aod382987 years agoNew TravelerTerrible fix. I zeta'd Finn ages ago and now it's useless. I want my zeta back
"Dk_rek;c-1777158" wrote:
"Gannon;c-1777157" wrote:
"Dk_rek;c-1777150" wrote:
"Padas;c-1777142" wrote:
Zeta refunds should be given and the players should be allowed to reinvest it if they deem this new completely different kit worthy of their hard earned resources.
NOTHING really changed except the 3po cheese........ would love to see number of ppl who just zeta'd him for 3p0..... wrong.... old finn zeta was still a GA or TW win against most teams...
sorry but as long as TM swing in PVP stayed the same...which it did it's BETTER..... i see no issue with this...
I don't have 3po in defense yet
No dude, instead of 35% tm gain it is now 3% per resistance ally. This will cripple its viability against first order, which was the reason many ppl zeta'd him. Not everyone did it for the c3p0 loop thing.
you gain 15 THEY LOSE 25 IT'S A 40 PERCENT SWING
Only the targeted enemy loses TM."Dk_rek;c-1777138" wrote:
I did not read pages 2-6 just first page so far but the refund requests are insane...the TM swing for the resistance team is now 40% instead of 35.... stacking damage make is so you get more than 25k damage in sith raid with a B team.... So it kills 3p0 cheese.... far as old school resistance.... kit sounds better.. only problem i see is with finn tanking so much I hope that defense helps cause he's squishy
I like
@Dk_rek 40% swing versus a single target instead of the whole team, and 25% of that is now resistable and goes through tenacity check.- Gannon0097 years agoSeasoned Ace
"Dk_rek;c-1777158" wrote:
"Gannon;c-1777157" wrote:
"Dk_rek;c-1777150" wrote:
"Padas;c-1777142" wrote:
Zeta refunds should be given and the players should be allowed to reinvest it if they deem this new completely different kit worthy of their hard earned resources.
NOTHING really changed except the 3po cheese........ would love to see number of ppl who just zeta'd him for 3p0..... wrong.... old finn zeta was still a GA or TW win against most teams...
sorry but as long as TM swing in PVP stayed the same...which it did it's BETTER..... i see no issue with this...
I don't have 3po in defense yet
No dude, instead of 35% tm gain it is now 3% per resistance ally. This will cripple its viability against first order, which was the reason many ppl zeta'd him. Not everyone did it for the c3p0 loop thing.
you gain 15 THEY LOSE 25 IT'S A 40 PERCENT SWING
No. You gain 15, one of them loses 25 maybe. Potency/tenacity check will block it most of the time.
I doubt they can keep up with a kru team with that low gain - “We look forward to your feedback on this proposed change.”
Here’s the feedback: Refund the zeta. @CG_Carrie - Garbage change on his leadership. This Can only have been because of the counter to revan, as the year old (tedious) p3 raid had much simpler options for a fix.
The fact that you guys had previously posted this was fine in other areas of the game is a real big finger to your player base.
And for all those harping on about the changes being good in referance to the ramping damage. Great but I don’t need his leadership zetaed for it. And will only work in lower raids where he and his team, can be kept alive. We already have wampa and young han, that can do it as solo toons, so it’s hardly exciting.
They basically killed a multiple meta counter. Whoopie to 5 min timeout mirror fights right?
A zeta refund is only fair. - CalvinAwesome967 years agoSeasoned Adventurer
"BakerHughes;c-1777156" wrote:
"CalvinAwesome;c-1777148" wrote:
Changing a product or service without offering some type of refund is just simply unethical. This really should have been considered
Hahaha. Unethical.
It is a game, and they changed one minor element of it. If they introduce a new character that is better than the one you just geared up and made him useless with the introduction, is that unethical?
You need perspective. If that is the most "unethical" thing to happen to you, congratulations.
Never said it was the most unethical to happen to me. It is a game, and in fact minor. However, none of this changes the facts "Gannon;c-1777165" wrote:
"Dk_rek;c-1777158" wrote:
"Gannon;c-1777157" wrote:
"Dk_rek;c-1777150" wrote:
"Padas;c-1777142" wrote:
Zeta refunds should be given and the players should be allowed to reinvest it if they deem this new completely different kit worthy of their hard earned resources.
NOTHING really changed except the 3po cheese........ would love to see number of ppl who just zeta'd him for 3p0..... wrong.... old finn zeta was still a GA or TW win against most teams...
sorry but as long as TM swing in PVP stayed the same...which it did it's BETTER..... i see no issue with this...
I don't have 3po in defense yet
No dude, instead of 35% tm gain it is now 3% per resistance ally. This will cripple its viability against first order, which was the reason many ppl zeta'd him. Not everyone did it for the c3p0 loop thing.
you gain 15 THEY LOSE 25 IT'S A 40 PERCENT SWING
No. You gain 15, one of them loses 25 maybe. Potency/tenacity check will block it most of the time.
I doubt they can keep up with a kru team with that low gain
This.
Here’s the important part you’re missing from the kit Dk:the target enemy loses 5% Turn Meter for each Resistance ally.
About SWGOH General Discussion
Discuss and share your feedback on Star Wars: Galaxy of Heroes with fellow players.82,385 PostsLatest Activity: 9 minutes ago
Community Highlights
- CG_Meathead7 months ago
Capital Games Team
- CG_Meathead2 years ago
Capital Games Team
Recent Discussions
- 9 minutes ago
- 2 hours ago
- 2 hours ago
- 2 hours ago
- 3 hours ago