ventress and sith

"Grpeephole303;918022" wrote:
Ventress was never a sith... She however is a dark jedi

"Treadhead2017;918031" wrote:

Ventress was never a sith... She however is a dark jedi

Maybe. But within the canon - the show itself - she is never called a dark jedi. She IS, however, called a Sith by Dooku.

Give Dookus direct qoute.

Because as far as im aware. Ventress was being played as a way for the Jedi to think Dooku was the sith master.

But was never trained as a sith.... Meerly as a darkside user with lightsabers..... hench Dark Jedi

Afterall General Grevious was trained by Dooku in the Jedi arts...... Is he then a Jedi because thats what Dooku told him?

Sweet Odin's raven...

Will you people get over the fact that Asajj is NOT going to be made into a sith?

I swear I saw this horse twitch. Beat it again!

And again.

And again.

And again.

And again.

And again.

https://forums.galaxy-of-heroes.starwars.ea.com/search?Page=p1&adv=&search=Ventress+sith&title=&author=&cat=all&tags=&discussion_d=1&discussion_poll=1&comment_c=1&within=1+day&date=

AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!

"methoss1004;918090" wrote:
I made the origonal post that asked for her tag again and dev responded to. Anyway, while I think there are good reasons for her to have the tag, I completly understand the dev response (emphasis added).

"CG_CapGaSP;906698" wrote:
The version of Asajj we have in game currently will not be getting the Sith affiliation.

Like many other characters in the game they may have many affiliations throughout their lives, but the character in GoH is a snapshot from a given part of their timeline. Thus CG has determined that this "version" will not include a Sith tag. Clearly her timeline has various affiliations such as Nightsister, ,Separatist, Scoundrel and Sith (debated). For this version they have used the Nightsister part of her timeline. So likely this is after leaving Dooku and realigning with the Nightsisters, but prior to her becoming a bounty hunter. Given that the Separatist tag seems off, but meh not my decision.

The other key thing in capgasp comment is affiliation. That means someone can be associated with the faction but does not have to be one to possibly get the affiliation.

"Hbk146;94347" wrote:
so they released a sith assassin and branded him a sith. so what is up with assajj? the whole argument was that she is no real sith apprentice but merely a sith assassin of dooku's. that argument is now obsolete.

@Hbk146
The Sith Assassin is FEMALE

They must get approval for the tags they put on the toons from Lucasflim/Disney. In regards to Asajj they were told she can not be labeled a sith. Out of their hands. Nothing can/will be done about.

"War;917709" wrote:

"scuba;917702" wrote:

"War;917701" wrote:

"scuba;917687" wrote:

"War;917680" wrote:
People can argue both sides of this with valid points, albeit the Sith side a little less valid. But game wise she already has two tags, Nightsister and Separatist. No character as of yet has three factions tags, so this whole argument is kind of pointless.

88 will disagree with you
droid, Scoundrel, bounty hunter.

I forgot that they retconned a bunch of characters with Scoundrel tags after the introduction of credit heists. And then later introduced the Bounty Hunter tag with Boba's rework. He probably would have never received Scoundrel tag were it not for credit heists.

So he's not really the best argument for this particular discussion. Just a victim of circumstance when it came to ending up with more than two tags.

lol

Can't tell if laughing with me or at me. But still worth the lolz, lol.

That made me lol

"OdinOakenshield;917663" wrote:
Personally I would prefer the Bounty Hunter tag, then the discussion would be over.

But that's a completely different outfit--which she donned after separating from Dooku and the Separatists. :-)