We need a button to stop deployment
All the best laid plans of 49/50 can be undone by the 1. Recently in a new capacity as an officer, and seeing either people almost ruin all your TB or TW plans, or flat or just do it, is so deflati...
Forum Discussion
"CG_Doja_Fett_MINI;c-2282436" wrote:
It's def frustrating, but a point I've heard more than once from the dev side is that they don't want to take agency and decision-making away from players (for example, giving one player the power to undo or override another player's actions).
Having said that, maybe there's a good idea that serves as a happy medium which could find its way onto the QoL list Crumb have established.
I’ve seen this before and it’s a fascinating argument to me. CG is opposed to one player interfering with another player’s decision-making, but seem to have no problem with one player interfering with the decisions of 49 other players.
A player agrees to follow the instructions of the officers of the guild when they join. If someone disagrees with the instructions they are free to leave the guild. That’s their agency and decision-making. CG allowing them to mess with the 49 other people’s decisions is the real issue at hand. It’s not the imagined interference the one person is experiencing from guild leaders when they try to preserve the team effort using proper tools.
