Forum Discussion

Legend91x's avatar
2 years ago

When will CG start testing things?

It's already been a bit hilarious for quite some time now, especially the Executor release comes to mind or the Traya vs LV thing recently, but can you maybe do some testing first before throwing stuff into the wild and now seemingly throwing hotfixes at it only a few hours later?
This is getting ridiculous.
  • "Legend91;c-2414503" wrote:
    Oh wow, we have reached the stage of "we know it's bugged but we gonna release it anyway" with the Merrin release, cool.

    Trench also bugged with his assists.

    GI instakill bypassing Ben getting fixed, interesting. Maybe while you're at it, fix his instakill to actually work and not be stopped by JMK's savior if GI only has 2 omis? But I guess being forced to apply all 3 omis to make the special one actually work vs JMK is by design. Apply omi to activate another omi is the new hot stuff.


    The funniest part about the Grand Inquisitor bug is it occurs under Reva lead even if you have all 3 applied.
  • Well they found a bug with Merrin the day before she got released. So I'd say there is no testing done before a character/ship is released.

    As we all joke we are the testers
  • Whatelse73's avatar
    Whatelse73
    Rising Vanguard
    CG probably isn't losing any money by not testing everything to the fullest before they release it. Especially when players will find the problems for free.

    They claimed it was the beta program that leaked the datacrons and other stuff, but things are still getting leaked. So, maybe it wasn't the beta program?

    If it starts effecting their revenue, perhaps they will start something like a beta tester group again. Doubtful though.

    They don't even put all the bugs they know about on the dev tracker, nor have they fixed certain bugs for an extended period of time. (The Tech EMP nade noise reverberation after a match still happens once or twice a week and that one's been going on since Bad Batch was released.)
  • "Johnnyreb;c-2414873" wrote:
    $$CG$$ thinks it’s more cost effective to just let the players do all their testing and when there are enough complaints then maybe they’ll think about adjusting the toon or ship. We are just free labor to them!!!!


    To be fair, the people that do day 1 testing usually pay for the privilege.
  • Oh wow, looks like you can't roll the UFU stuff on lvl6 for DS, only for LS, cool. Thanks god CG made a PSA post about it. Oh wait...
  • "Legend91;c-2417400" wrote:
    Oh wow, looks like you can't roll the UFU stuff on lvl6 for DS, only for LS, cool. Thanks god CG made a PSA post about it. Oh wait...


    Wrong thread.

    I'm pretty sure this was purposeful, since the other two factions are DS.
  • I stand corrected, there is a way to know UFU can only spawn for LS crons by lvling up a DC to 3 and then check the "can target / can target with re-roll of level 3).
    Would be nice to have more precise info in the DC set info post that are being posted by Meathead so guild officers don't need to start theory crafting based on wrong assumptions.
  • Whatelse73's avatar
    Whatelse73
    Rising Vanguard
    "Legend91;c-2417422" wrote:
    I stand corrected, there is a way to know UFU can only spawn for LS crons by lvling up a DC to 3 and then check the "can target / can target with re-roll of level 3).
    Would be nice to have more precise info in the DC set info post that are being posted by Meathead so guild officers don't need to start theory crafting based on wrong assumptions.


    If guild officers don't make wrong assumptions, how will content get tested for CG?