Forum Discussion
petersphilo
2 years agoRising Novice
So.. Here's where @BubbaFett may have had a point..
We've been paying very close attention to our matchups (remember, this is in TW), and a few of us Officers have found a trend..
It seems like, in the Territory Wars where we had more than 2 or 3 of our members who failed to join, we had terrible matches..
Conversely, in the Territory Wars where we had only 1 or 2 members who failed to join, we got more decent matchups..
So, basically, the closer we are to full signup, the more likely we are to get a fair matchup..
However, there's a big problem with that..
It looks like the algorithm doesn't look at how many people are in your Guild, just how close you are to 50..
We've had a few retirements lately, and we've been at 46 for a few turns..
If we have so much as 1 member fail to join, the algorithm thinks we're sandbagging 5 people, and we get a crap matchup..
We've been paying very close attention to our matchups (remember, this is in TW), and a few of us Officers have found a trend..
It seems like, in the Territory Wars where we had more than 2 or 3 of our members who failed to join, we had terrible matches..
Conversely, in the Territory Wars where we had only 1 or 2 members who failed to join, we got more decent matchups..
So, basically, the closer we are to full signup, the more likely we are to get a fair matchup..
However, there's a big problem with that..
It looks like the algorithm doesn't look at how many people are in your Guild, just how close you are to 50..
We've had a few retirements lately, and we've been at 46 for a few turns..
If we have so much as 1 member fail to join, the algorithm thinks we're sandbagging 5 people, and we get a crap matchup..
About SWGOH General Discussion
Discuss and share your feedback on Star Wars: Galaxy of Heroes with fellow players.
77,975 PostsLatest Activity: 2 minutes agoRelated Posts
Recent Discussions
- 2 minutes ago
- 5 minutes ago
- 8 minutes ago