Why doesn't Asaj Ventress have a Sith tag?

Savage was also trained by Maul, with the intention of making him a true sith, whereas Asajj is just an assasin for Dooku. If it was just based on Dookus training I doubt that Savage would have been considered a sith lord

Please not again... Why dont you just search for the last thousand times this has been posted?

Grievous was trained by Dooku the same way asajj was: as a fighting force for the separatists. The rule of two is a constant:

Dark Lord of the Sith: Palpatine - Darth Sidious
Sith Lord Apprentice: Dooku - Darth Tyrannus (at the time)
Sith Lord’s Disciples: Ventress, Grevious

Later, Anakin replaces Dooku as Darth Vader, just as Dooku replaced Darth Maul. Vader took on disciples that were not recognized as Sith as well, like Galen Marek (Starkiller). This isn’t canon anymore, but it falls under the same general concepts / structure.

*marek was a secret apprentice of Vader as a Sith, publicly recognized as an agent / disciple. When Emperor Palpatine confronted Vader about it, he faked Marek’s death and sent him on missions in secret to plot against the Emperor, planning to take over. Dooku never had plans like that with Ventress, but Darth Maul did!

Cannonically from Star Wars Clone Wars tv show, Maul resurfaced after being in Exile from being defeated by Obi-Wan in Ep 1, taking on Savage as a formal apprentice. When confronting Darth Sidious, he was asked if Savage was his apprentice - when confirmed, Sidious then referred to Maul as a “rival,” practicing his own structure for the Rule of Two, since he’d been through formal Sith Training as Sidious’s apprentice. When defeated, and was sent back into exile until resurfacing in Star Wars Rebels TV show. At this point he was no longer identified as a Sith: just a dark side Force wielder.

i honestly hope they come out with a new "Bounty Hunter" version of her with a bounty hunter update release. that faction needs some meat on their collective bones.

"DarthMufasa4;c-1376436" wrote:
Savage was also trained by Maul, with the intention of making him a true sith, whereas Asajj is just an assasin for Dooku. If it was just based on Dookus training I doubt that Savage would have been considered a sith lord

Pst, the Sith assassin in game has a Sith tag. So does Sith trooper who had no Sith abilities

"FierceRevan;c-1376672" wrote:

"DarthMufasa4;c-1376436" wrote:
Savage was also trained by Maul, with the intention of making him a true sith, whereas Asajj is just an assasin for Dooku. If it was just based on Dookus training I doubt that Savage would have been considered a sith lord

Pst, the Sith assassin in game has a Sith tag. So does Sith trooper who had no Sith abilities

The sith assasin and trooper came from a different time of sith where rule of 2 didnt exist. So what classed as a sith at this time was different, And their ties were to sith as opposed to ventress who wasnt really knowledgeable in the rule of 2.

Bounty hunter is perfectly fine though. would be a welcome addition to the game

Savage trained under dooku for like 1 day... Unless Dooku makes him his apprentice again later in the clone wars.

"FierceRevan;c-1376917" wrote:
@DarthMufasa4

Rule of two was not followed all the time

Rule of two is not canon

Rule of two does not a Sith make.

It is canon than asajj was a Sith (current canon character encyclopedia)

Firstly it is canon, always a master and an apprentice. This is referenced in both the movies and in the clone wars tv series. (seeing qui gon jinns funeral, as well as the maul and savage vs sidious fight), and mauls speech to savage stating the rule of 2
"Rule of two does not a Sith make"
After Bane, yes it does, again canon.

send a link for ventress, as I know of no reliable source for her being a sith.

Rule of 2 is a structure. At the time, sidious had Dooku as his apprentice. Maul had savage as his apprentice. They were rivals for claiming the title of being the true Dark Lord of the Sith. All with Sith teachings and practices, but there can only be 2.

Yes, it is cannon. Rule of two doesn’t MAKE a Sith, no. But it is the practiced structure of those who are trained in the Sith ways and are familiar with the teachings.